On 10/12/2010 10:35 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
2010/10/12 James Antill <james@fedoraproject.org mailto:james@fedoraproject.org>
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:00 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:11 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: > > > - suggests a username and hostname based on the user's real name > > > (Mac OS X's installer also does this -- it's a nice touch) > > > > If DNS knows a hostname, we will suggest that. Of course it's not > > foolproof. > > That's not it. Your name is entered (Chris Lumens) and from it you > should get a hostname (chris-lumens-fedora-desktop.local) as well as a > presentation name ("Chris Lumens' Fedora Desktop") which could be used > for things like services being advertised through avahi, or even the > default name for the Bluetooth adapters. The Mac does this too, and I'm sure it's great for avahi stuff ... but it's really annoying for anyone using the hostname anywhere else (mainly due to the expected size). Is there nowhere else that we could store a "hostsummary" instead of hostname? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I believe anaconda is Ok, But many users complain about it, I honestly can't understand why.
because it's ugly. among ALL installers that I've used ( mint / debian / suse >=9 ) anaconda has the ugliest user interface. And I mean all versions that I ever used , in RH ( pre-RHEL era), Centos and Fedora.
What I can undersand and even say is that anaconda needs a little "more polished" experience.
exactly. there are tons of facilities but the aspect "could be improved"