On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:44 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:14 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> It's just that realistically, changing this would essentially mean
> "any headless machine will not be able to be logged into without kickstart
> machinations". I don't think that's an improvement.
This is, in fact, the point.
Think of it this way:
- httpd defaults to off when it is installed
- should we have it on b/c if you can't get to the shell then you
can't turn it on?
One difference is that httpd doesn't provide what could well be "the
shell"...
Jeremy