On 07/15/2013 10:21 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:53 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" johannbg@gmail.com wrote:
And honestly I dont understand why people are ack/nack-ing this since this is FESCO decision
Some of us would like to think that FESCO members might be influenced by arguments made on the development list. Maybe that's just wishful thinking.
I would assume they take into account hard valid technical arguments not change in workflow ( which any change might bring ) or people pluses or minuses but maybe that's just my wishful thinking.
JBG