Hi, the best solution I think is to ask authors to clarify license and ask them to include LICENSE file in source tarball.
R. --- Jaroslav Reznik jreznik@redhat.com Software Engineer - Base OS Core Services Brno Red Hat, Inc. +420 532 294 275
----- "Adam Tkac" atkac@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm reviewing dnsperf package - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798. Licence of code is written only in source code itself:
...
- Copyright (C) 2004 - 2008 Nominum, Inc.
- Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and
its
- documentation for any purpose with or without fee is hereby
granted,
- provided that the above copyright notice and this permission
notice
- appear in all copies.
...
What should be correct licence tag? The licence is BSD compatible so can I recommend BSD licence tag?
Regards, Adam
-- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list