On 07/18/2013 12:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 17.07.13 17:50, Denys Vlasenko (dvlasenk@redhat.com) wrote:
On 07/17/2013 05:21 PM, John.Florian@dart.biz wrote:
From: sclark@netwolves.com
This seems like such a specious argument. Maybe it made sense when we were talking about disk drives that were megabytes in size, but now we have 500 gigabyte drives usually as a minimum.
You don't ever work with embedded systems, do you?
If you are running systemd on a embedded system, you are clearly not concerned about saving space :)
There are actually quite a few embedded devices running systemd these days. Wind generators, outer space telescopes, cars, toys, quite a lot of other stuff. We do get reports about this from time to time.
Did I say systemd can't be run on an embedded device?
I said that if one runs systemd on a embedded system, then this device isn't seriously resource constrained.
Do you see that these two statements are not the same?
So, no snarky comments about embedded devices, please, it's entirely inappropriate.
What's inappropriate is giving instructions to others what they can, or can not say.