On Wed, 30.03.11 12:41, David Lutterkort (lutter(a)redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:30 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> > There are many directories already in Fedora that are not
> > defined by FHS and even though we have asked them to update
> > it (libexec, /selinux /sys etc), there is noone maintaining
> > it.
>
> This is stunningly untrue. I've worked for years in the
> fields of LSB, FHS and LANANA to make sure there are traceable
> paths for such requests. Post the URLs to your bugs in the
> LSB / LF tracker if you assert you have done such
How do changes to the FHS actually happen ? All I can find is the names
of the three past editors of the standard, and a mailing list that seems
to be overrun by spam.
There doesn't seem to be any body/group that meets regularly to resolve
issues and work towards an FHS update.
I wonder if the LSB folks feel responsible for this. Not that I was a
big fan of the LSB work (making up "standards" out of thin air and
stuff), but there's at least somebody commited to standards.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.