On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 02:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Adam says that devel is relevant to "*developers* (or rather, packagers)". Yet there is the "packaging" list, too. Quote from Oct 16th: "I don't know whether this belongs to the packaging or devel list,"
Now to me, THAT seems like a redundancy :) devel@ is the list for, well, developing Fedora. Is there a history behind the packaging list? I'm not familiar with it. Is it actually used much?