Fabio Valentini wrote:
There's a difference between *claiming* LSB compliance (what you refer to as backwards compatibility ?) and actually *achieving* it. Claiming it (the thing we objected to) without achieving it (i.e. the status quo for many Fedora releases) is a lie that helps nobody.
True, but the issue is that FESCo sees the bug in the claim and not in the failure to achieve it, which is where the real issue lies.
Kevin Kofler