On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Matthew Garrett mjg59@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:22:37PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
I think the responsibility of these things should be placed upon the SIG members who perform the functions from within these different groups. Why not have a QA person from each SIG work together with the larger QA efforts instead of potentially against them?
If a spin wants to use a modified kernel package, what's the procedure for ensuring that it receives the same level of QA as the normal kernel?
<snip>
That's not something I think would be in the scope of a SIG, nor do I think something like that would make it past Spin review. This would also take the current SIG/Spin outside the scope of being part of the Fedora Project as it is no longer using Fedora packages, this (in my opinion at least) would be a situation where a fork would be needed.
-AdamM