On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 15:09 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IMHO the only viable option is to maintain both python 2.x and 3.x
in parallel. It is essentially a brand new language which just
happens to share the same base name. Like Perl 5 & Perl 6.
It's much less like Perl-5/Perl-6, IMO, but even if you convince FESCo
of this mental contortion and you have dual sets of _every_ python
module. The API is very similar and uses the same shared library
name ... so what do you do about all the C programs that link with
libpython?
repoquery --whatrequires 'libpython2.5.so.*'
...are you going to offer two versions of rhythmbox?
--
James Antill <james(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora