On 2/16/07, Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 03:37 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 09:32 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 02:19 +0000, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On 2/16/07, Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 02:33 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 08:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I don't think you've ever said how the information is being sent without user permission or what the personal data is that is being sent.
The smolt developers would be the ones to reply this.
The smolt developers and the smolt code HAS replied to this.
Yes, but this thread started with "Shall smolt be installed by default", so the question wasn't "opt-in/opt-out", it was "installed by default"
I expressed my opinion and said: No, ...
Arthur's was "how" - I said "http:" and "what"
Ralf
I think "installed by default" here means that the Smolt code will be on the install media and copied to the hard drive by default (if even that much) - installing sends no data - the user has to choose to run it. hence the "opt-in" . The discussion on opt-in/out ended long ago.