On Ter, 2016-04-19 at 10:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:20:51 +0100 Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
On Seg, 2016-04-18 at 23:54 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review and it seems I'm hitting these two bugs:
- dnf repoquery --resolve is extremely slow #1279538
I already change priority and severity of #1279538 to urgent
Just as a side note, I don't know anyone who actually uses or cares about these fields in Fedora land.
we need it for fedora-review
IMHO you are much better off just explaining why the bug is important or what it blocks.
because is a dnf bug , that is not acceptable , IMHO .
time dnf repoquery -q -C --requires glibc (...) real 0m1.335s user 0m1.084s sys 0m0.110s
time dnf repoquery -q -C --requires --resolve glibc (...) real 4m24.474s user 4m22.064s sys 0m2.130s
with CPU usage in 100% !
kevin
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject. org