On 04/29/2010 09:24 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
By that logic we shouldn't have a development group at all since
developers
know what they need.
I sense a misunderstanding.
Yes, IMO, any "default" (preselection) of "a devel group of packages"
hardly makes sense. However, marking packages as members of an optional
"devel group of packages" surely makes sense.
Or differently: One person's most valuable devel-tool is another
person's packaging bloat ;)
Ralf
-AdamM (from Android )
On Apr 29, 2010 2:07 AM, "Ralf Corsepius"<rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
On 04/28/2010 09:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>> Rex Dieter (rdieter@math.un...
Make both optional.
Devs should know what they need, so there should not be any need to make
any of them default.
Ralf