4:28 a.m.
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736
I've had about 100 bugs set to NEEDINFO of me to check if some obscure
Fedora package is vulnerable to some 1 or 2 year old bug.
Is this a useful use of anyone's time?
I am going to close them all WONTFIX.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org
5:11 a.m.
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736
I've had about 100 bugs set to NEEDINFO of me to check if some obscure
Fedora package is vulnerable to some 1 or 2 year old bug.
Is this a useful use of anyone's time?
it is hard to tell without examples. Are the packages properly
maintained and up to date? Are the obscure packages your packages? If
not, by were you the target of the NEEDINFO?
Kind regards
Till
5:25 a.m.
This issue was caused by me as part of post-F26 EOL housekeeping,
following the https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736#comment-455818 FESCo
decision. If this approach is causing issues we can skip the step
setting "needinfo" flag and leave just a comment in the bug.
I am sorry for any inconvenience this might caused.
Jan
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736
>
> I've had about 100 bugs set to NEEDINFO of me to check if some obscure
> Fedora package is vulnerable to some 1 or 2 year old bug.
>
> Is this a useful use of anyone's time?
it is hard to tell without examples. Are the packages properly
maintained and up to date? Are the obscure packages your packages? If
not, by were you the target of the NEEDINFO?
Kind regards
Till
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
--
Jan Kuřík
JBoss EAP Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
5:28 a.m.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Jan Kurik <jkurik(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This issue was caused by me as part of post-F26 EOL housekeeping,
following the https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736#comment-455818 FESCo
decision. If this approach is causing issues we can skip the step
setting "needinfo" flag and leave just a comment in the bug.
I am sorry for any inconvenience this might caused.
There for some reason was also bugs from f23 moved forward to f27, no
idea why the scripts are touching f23 but they should be closed EOL
rather than moved.
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736
>>>
>>> I've had about 100 bugs set to NEEDINFO of me to check if some obscure
>>> Fedora package is vulnerable to some 1 or 2 year old bug.
>>>
>>> Is this a useful use of anyone's time?
>>
>> it is hard to tell without examples. Are the packages properly
>> maintained and up to date? Are the obscure packages your packages? If
>> not, by were you the target of the NEEDINFO?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Till
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
>
>
>
> --
> Jan Kuřík
> JBoss EAP Program Manager
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
5:38 a.m.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Jan Kurik <jkurik(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> This issue was caused by me as part of post-F26 EOL housekeeping,
> following the https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736#comment-455818 FESCo
> decision. If this approach is causing issues we can skip the step
> setting "needinfo" flag and leave just a comment in the bug.
>
> I am sorry for any inconvenience this might caused.
There for some reason was also bugs from f23 moved forward to f27, no
idea why the scripts are touching f23 but they should be closed EOL
rather than moved.
As far as I can tell, all the bugs having version set to value less
than 26 were already closed as EOL and reopened. As these bugs were
re-opened, I requested a review instead of closing these again. In
case these bugs will be left untouched, the post-F27 EOL housekeeping
should close these again.
Jan
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Till Maas
<opensource(a)till.name> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736
>>>
>>> I've had about 100 bugs set to NEEDINFO of me to check if some obscure
>>> Fedora package is vulnerable to some 1 or 2 year old bug.
>>>
>>> Is this a useful use of anyone's time?
>>
>> it is hard to tell without examples. Are the packages properly
>> maintained and up to date? Are the obscure packages your packages? If
>> not, by were you the target of the NEEDINFO?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Till
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
>
>
>
> --
> Jan Kuřík
> JBoss EAP Program Manager
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
--
Jan Kuřík
JBoss EAP Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
2167
days inactive
2167
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Jan Kurik -
Peter Robinson -
Richard W.M. Jones -
Till Maas