-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian Pepple schrieb: I have got a short view on this proposal and want to talk about my mind: In the first sentence I could read, that the amount of 5 pakcages was a requirement to get provenpackager state. In fact the only thing on which I could remember is, that you have to packaged a cretain amount of packages to get provenpackager state during the seeding procedure. The current state from my view is, that we have none guidelines which helps you to decide if you should accept a sponsor request or net. On the other hand, after reading the proposal it's seem, that you need a special technical infrastructure to build up the descriped procedure, so this proposal is unusable for a short-term solution how we want to handle sponsoring request for the provenpackager group. On the other hand, if we take the dicision in the hand of FESCo, poeple may think, that there are not diffent requirement to become a provenpackager or a sponsor. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Victor Vasilyev <Victor.Vasilyev(a)sun.com&gt; wrote: This special meeting is simply to clear the backlog from a meeting that would have gone all day last week :) - I don't remember that one from last week.