3:07 p.m.
Attn Fesco,
Per the Fedora Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMai...
* After another 7 days (now 3 weeks total), the reporter posts a formal
request to the fedora-devel list with the bug link, indicating all reasonable
efforts have been made to contact the maintainer have failed and that they wish
to take over the package.
I would like to trigger the next phase of the non-responsive maintainer policy.
Extensive efforts have been made at various email addresses to contact John but
no replies have been received. In addition two separate bugzilla entries were
made against his package gallery2 asking for his response:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474870
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476477
Please remove him from the primary maintainer list for his packages. orphan any
packages that that leaves maintainerless.
Involved packages include ratpoison, squidguard, wordpress, bugzilla, gallery2.
Jon Ciesla (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474870#c7) requested
maintainership for gallery2. He has already provided updates.
Thanks,
Cry
3:12 p.m.
New subject: Attn FESco: Non-Responsive Maintainer - John Berninger
We have the same problem for SS5 package
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/ss5
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Cry <cry_regarder(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Attn Fesco,
Per the Fedora Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMai...
* After another 7 days (now 3 weeks total), the reporter posts a formal
request to the fedora-devel list with the bug link, indicating all reasonable
efforts have been made to contact the maintainer have failed and that they wish
to take over the package.
I would like to trigger the next phase of the non-responsive maintainer policy.
Extensive efforts have been made at various email addresses to contact John but
no replies have been received. In addition two separate bugzilla entries were
made against his package gallery2 asking for his response:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474870
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476477
Please remove him from the primary maintainer list for his packages. orphan any
packages that that leaves maintainerless.
Involved packages include ratpoison, squidguard, wordpress, bugzilla, gallery2.
Jon Ciesla (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474870#c7) requested
maintainership for gallery2. He has already provided updates.
Thanks,
Cry
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
------------
Itamar Reis Peixoto
e-mail/msn: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
sip: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+55 11 4063 5033
+55 34 3221 8599
3:10 p.m.
Cry wrote:
Per the Fedora Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMai...
* After another 7 days (now 3 weeks total), the reporter posts a formal
Given
that this time of year in some places is the long holiday period,
ending within a week or so, perhaps it's worth holding off for another
week ?
3:17 p.m.
Cry wrote:
> Per the Fedora Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy at:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMai...
>
> * After another 7 days (now 3 weeks total), the reporter posts a
> formal
Given that this time of year in some places is the long holiday period,
ending within a week or so, perhaps it's worth holding off for another
week ?
+1. Just in case. But things were sorta dry before that. . .
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
11:46 p.m.
New subject: Attn FESco: Non-Responsive Maintainer - John Berninger
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> wrote:
+1. Just in case. But things were sorta dry before that. . .
Well, this isn't the first time that we've had this discussion, see
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-December/msg00237....
for more, but I'm sure all involved remember :)
I'm fine with waiting however long folks feel is appropriate though.
I'd take Bugzilla, but I'm not a perl expert (or even novice really),
so I don't think I'd be the right person for that job :)
I'd also like to start a discussion of what happens when someone is
declared non-responsive. Do we remove them from the packager group?
AFAIK, there's no policy around that, packages just get orphaned.
I'll start a new thread on that topic, though.
2:17 p.m.
Cry wrote:
> Per the Fedora Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy at:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMai...
>
> * After another 7 days (now 3 weeks total), the reporter posts a
> formal
Given that this time of year in some places is the long holiday period,
ending within a week or so, perhaps it's worth holding off for another
week ?
FYI, contact with John has been made. Parties interesting in his pacakges
should see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474870.
Also, this means bugzilla is up for grabs.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
in your fear, speak only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
5560
days inactive
5568
days old
5 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Cry -
Development discussions related to Fedora -
itamar -
Jon Ciesla -
Jon Stanley