Hi,
the best solution I think is to ask authors to
clarify license and ask them to include LICENSE
file in source tarball.
R.
---
Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base OS Core Services Brno
Red Hat, Inc.
+420 532 294 275
----- "Adam Tkac" <atkac(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm reviewing dnsperf package -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798. Licence of code
is
written only in source code itself:
...
* Copyright (C) 2004 - 2008 Nominum, Inc.
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and
its
* documentation for any purpose with or without fee is hereby
granted,
* provided that the above copyright notice and this permission
notice
* appear in all copies.
...
What should be correct licence tag? The licence is BSD compatible so
can I recommend BSD licence tag?
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list