5:04 p.m.
Rawhide has kernel-2.6.8-1.541, the same as what came with FC3T2. Has
their not been and new development kernels since then?
Somehow I am running kernel-2.6.8-1.590, I got this from rawhide maybe a
week ago. Then the kernel version went back to .541. Should I be
testing .541 or .590?
--Thanks
5:17 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:04:24PM -0400, Louis Garcia wrote:
Rawhide has kernel-2.6.8-1.541, the same as what came with FC3T2.
Has
their not been and new development kernels since then?
No. Lots of internal jiggling of patches and such for SELinux among
other chaos.
Somehow I am running kernel-2.6.8-1.590, I got this from rawhide
maybe a
week ago. Then the kernel version went back to .541.
.590 was bad aparently, and causes zillions of selinux warnings.
Should I be testing .541 or .590?
.598 8-) Coming to a mirror near you. Soon. (or more likely -- tomorrow)
In the meantime, .541 is probably the safer choice.
Dave
4:22 p.m.
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:04:24PM -0400, Louis Garcia wrote:
> Rawhide has kernel-2.6.8-1.541, the same as what came with FC3T2. Has
> their not been and new development kernels since then?
No. Lots of internal jiggling of patches and such for SELinux among
other chaos.
> Somehow I am running kernel-2.6.8-1.590, I got this from rawhide maybe a
> week ago. Then the kernel version went back to .541.
.590 was bad aparently, and causes zillions of selinux warnings.
> Should I be testing .541 or .590?
.598 8-) Coming to a mirror near you. Soon. (or more likely -- tomorrow)
In the meantime, .541 is probably the safer choice.
Will it fix the problems with cd burning?
11:07 p.m.
Le mercredi 06 octobre 2004 à 14:22 -0700, alan a écrit :
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:04:24PM -0400, Louis Garcia wrote:
> > Rawhide has kernel-2.6.8-1.541, the same as what came with FC3T2. Has
> > their not been and new development kernels since then?
>
> No. Lots of internal jiggling of patches and such for SELinux among
> other chaos.
>
> > Somehow I am running kernel-2.6.8-1.590, I got this from rawhide maybe a
> > week ago. Then the kernel version went back to .541.
>
> .590 was bad aparently, and causes zillions of selinux warnings.
>
> > Should I be testing .541 or .590?
>
> .598 8-) Coming to a mirror near you. Soon. (or more likely -- tomorrow)
> In the meantime, .541 is probably the safer choice.
Will it fix the problems with cd burning?
What problem ?
This one ?:
http://lwn.net/Articles/98379/
11:24 p.m.
--- Matias F�liciano <feliciano.matias(a)free.fr> wrote:
Le mercredi 06 octobre 2004 � 14:22 -0700, alan a �crit :
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:04:24PM -0400, Louis Garcia wrote:
> > > Rawhide has kernel-2.6.8-1.541, the same as what came with
FC3T2. Has
> > > their not been and new development kernels since then?
> >
> > No. Lots of internal jiggling of patches and such for SELinux
among
> > other chaos.
> >
> > > Somehow I am running kernel-2.6.8-1.590, I got this from
rawhide maybe a
> > > week ago. Then the kernel version went back to .541.
> >
> > .590 was bad aparently, and causes zillions of selinux warnings.
> >
> > > Should I be testing .541 or .590?
> >
> > .598 8-) Coming to a mirror near you. Soon. (or more likely --
tomorrow)
> > In the meantime, .541 is probably the safer choice.
>
> Will it fix the problems with cd burning?
>
What problem ?
This one ?:
http://lwn.net/Articles/98379/
If he meant this problem (the one i referred to in an earlier post) :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109309119620622&w=2
http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/7/37688.html
I think it's fixed in .541
3:34 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 09:24:12PM -0700, Denis Leroy wrote:
If he meant this problem (the one i referred to in an earlier post)
:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109309119620622&w=2
http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/7/37688.html
I think it's fixed in .541
I've had all sorts of problems swap storms in 541; easily triggered by
writing an audio CD.
(It's in bugzilla.)
Tim.
*/
1:28 a.m.
Hi,
> Somehow I am running kernel-2.6.8-1.590, I got this from
rawhide maybe a
> week ago. Then the kernel version went back to .541.
.590 was bad aparently, and causes zillions of selinux warnings.
I've been running 590 on the laptop (used every day for about 12 hours a
day) since it came out. Never a moments hassle.
TTFN
Paul
--
Homer: Donut?
Lisa: No, thanks. Do you have any fruit?
Homer: This has purple stuff inside. Purple is a fruit.
7:29 a.m.
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 02:28, Paul wrote:
I've been running 590 on the laptop (used every day for about 12
hours a
day) since it came out. Never a moments hassle.
Was SELinux enabled or disabled? At some point, Arjan's kernels dropped
the tmpfs xattr handler patch needed to allow udev/tmpfs to work with
SELinux, but it may have been restored (and the support has been
submitted upstream now in a different form and is in the -mm patches, I
think).
--
Stephen Smalley <sds(a)epoch.ncsc.mil>
National Security Agency
11:06 a.m.
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 08:29:25AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 02:28, Paul wrote:
> I've been running 590 on the laptop (used every day for about 12 hours a
> day) since it came out. Never a moments hassle.
Was SELinux enabled or disabled? At some point, Arjan's kernels dropped
the tmpfs xattr handler patch needed to allow udev/tmpfs to work with
SELinux, but it may have been restored (and the support has been
submitted upstream now in a different form and is in the -mm patches, I
think).
A variant of the -mm xattr patch is merged into the 598 kernel I built yesterday.
Dave
8:15 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:17:19PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Somehow I am running kernel-2.6.8-1.590, I got this from
rawhide maybe a
> week ago. Then the kernel version went back to .541.
.590 was bad aparently, and causes zillions of selinux warnings.
It worked fine for me, but I've got selinux disabled, anyway.
May I ask what happened to Arjan's kernel workbench
(http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/) ?
11:09 a.m.
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:15:23PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> > Somehow I am running kernel-2.6.8-1.590, I got this from
rawhide maybe a
> > week ago. Then the kernel version went back to .541.
> .590 was bad aparently, and causes zillions of selinux warnings.
It worked fine for me, but I've got selinux disabled, anyway.
May I ask what happened to Arjan's kernel workbench
(http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/) ?
In short: I'm building the Fedora kernels again.
What you find in the development tree should always be the latest
and greatest.
Dave
3:04 a.m.
Hi,
> .590 was bad aparently, and causes zillions of selinux
warnings.
It worked fine for me, but I've got selinux disabled, anyway.
Nope. SELinux enabled on it, .590 working without a hitch.
TTFN
Paul
--
Homer: Donut?
Lisa: No, thanks. Do you have any fruit?
Homer: This has purple stuff inside. Purple is a fruit.
7155
days inactive
7157
days old
12 comments
10 participants
participants (10)
-
Alan -
Dave Jones -
Denis Leroy -
Enrico Scholz -
Féliciano Matias -
Louis Garcia -
Paul F. Johnson -
Ralf Ertzinger -
Stephen Smalley -
Tim Waugh