On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:27:33AM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Josh Boyer<jwboyer(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:46:36PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>>On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:21:58AM +0000, Rawhide Report wrote:
>>
>> > kernel-2.6.31-0.42.rc2.fc12
>> > ---------------------------
>> > * Sat Jul 04 2009 Chuck Ebbert <cebbert(a)redhat.com>
>> > - 2.6.31-rc1-git11
>> >
>> > * Sat Jul 04 2009 Dave Jones <davej(a)redhat.com> 2.6.31-0.42.rc2
>> > - 2.6.31-rc2
>> >
>> > * Fri Jul 03 2009 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com>
>> > - Disable v4l1 ov511 and quickcam_messenger drivers (obsoleted by
>> > v4l2 gspca subdrivers)
>>
>>Why is the changelog out of order in the rawhide report?
>>It's the right way around in CVS.
>
> Because the script that generates it doesn't deal with multiple
> entries on the same day properly. It's becoming a common
> question.
Why does it mess with them at all?
It has to do at least _some_ munging, otherwise you don't get the actual
"this changed since the last rawhide report" part.
Why not just copy them from the specfile and assume that this is
correct?
I don't think it operates from CVS, so to get the specfile it would have to
unpack the SRPMs. Not very efficient. I believe it just uses the changelog
query on the RPM itself.
josh