old llvm/clang (14.0.6) in current epel9 build system while mock build has new version of clang/llvm (15.0.1)
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
Hi,
our current build system for epel9 contains old version (14.0.6) of
llvm/clang while mock build has the new version of clang/llvm (15.0.1).
there is bug in llvm 14.0.6 that causes linking error when building
chromium. The bug was fixed in llvm-15.x.
Is it possible to get new version of llvm/clang (15.0.1) in build system
for epel9?
Than
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 07:55, Than Ngo <than(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
our current build system for epel9 contains old version (14.0.6) of
llvm/clang while mock build has the new version of clang/llvm (15.0.1).
there is bug in llvm 14.0.6 that causes linking error when building
chromium. The bug was fixed in llvm-15.x.
The EPEL build system has been pushed to the CDN for RHEL9 which is
currently 14.0.6. Is your mock build using the CDN or somehow using either
CentOS Stream 9 or some other package set?
You will either need to:
1. Wait until LLVM-15 is released for RHEL-9 (which looks like 9.2 in
October/November)
2. Aim your builds at epel-next so it is using the CentOS Stream 9 packages
3. Work with whatever team 'owns' llvm and see if they can get a fix out to
the 9.1 stream
4. something else?
Is it possible to get new version of llvm/clang (15.0.1) in build
system
for epel9?
Than
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
7:47 a.m.
New subject: old llvm/clang (14.0.6) in current epel9 build system while
mock build has new version of clang/llvm (15.0.1)
* Than Ngo:
our current build system for epel9 contains old version (14.0.6) of
llvm/clang while mock build has the new version of clang/llvm
(15.0.1).
there is bug in llvm 14.0.6 that causes linking error when building
chromium. The bug was fixed in llvm-15.x.
Is it possible to get new version of llvm/clang (15.0.1) in build
system for epel9?
What “mock build” are you refering to? Is it about the c9s buildroot?
That's only compatible with epel-next, not epel, as far as I understand
it.
Thanks,
Florian
it is the standard mock build (centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64) which
includes centos-stream-9 and epel-9 repo.
Thanks,
Than
Am 03.01.23 um 14:47 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Than Ngo:
> our current build system for epel9 contains old version (14.0.6) of
> llvm/clang while mock build has the new version of clang/llvm
> (15.0.1).
> there is bug in llvm 14.0.6 that causes linking error when building
> chromium. The bug was fixed in llvm-15.x.
>
> Is it possible to get new version of llvm/clang (15.0.1) in build
> system for epel9?
What “mock build” are you refering to? Is it about the c9s buildroot?
That's only compatible with epel-next, not epel, as far as I understand
it.
Thanks,
Florian
485
days inactive
485
days old
3 comments
3 participants
tags (0)
participants (3)
-
Florian Weimer -
Stephen Smoogen -
Than Ngo