On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 06:45:13PM +0100, Michal Konecny wrote:
On 25/02/19 16:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2014-10-01)
Just want to point at date above ^
I missed that one
Oh, nothing important happened at that meeting ;)
On the one today, on the other hand:
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-02-25/fesco.2019-...
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-02-25/fesco.2019-...
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-02-25/fesco.2019-...
==
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2090 ==
AGREED: mboddu's proposal
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2090#comment-554540
is approved (+7, 0, 0)
==
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2088 ==
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/W8WBUJsA0Fj3epjfKkSzbA
ACTION: bowlofeggs will file an RFE for better error messages from dnf
REJECTED: Waiting for one more week (+2, 0, -3)
AGREED: Feature is postponed to F31, without accepting or
rejecting. We need more information from the Change owners about
specific cases that this solves (+6, 0, 0)
==
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2084 ==
AGREED: Creating a FAS identity that has permissions to upload stuff
to the lookaside cache, fork repos and send PRs (including kerberos
and all technical things to make it work), but not to push to repos or
build packages, is approved (+7, 0, 0)
FESCo is concerned that the presented idea of how this automation
should work is only applicable to a very limited set of packages and
would rather see a focus on automating stuff for greater
audience.
FESCo is also concerned that moving spec to upstream breaks experience
for multiple interested parties.
==
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2027 ==
https://pagure.io/modularity/working-documents/blob/master/f/lifecycles-u...
https://fpdc.fedoraproject.org/api/v1/
REJECTED: Proposal in its current form is accepted (+2, 2, -3)
(discussion to continue in the ticket after a new proposal)
Zbyszek