6:07 p.m.
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not interested in maintaining or we
can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others
can take them over.
If you have a way to contact this maintainer, please let them
know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
Thanks!
* jklimes - former email: jklimes(a)redhat.com
Point of contact:
rpms/mobile-broadband-provider-info -- Mobile broadband provider database ( master f23
f22 )
Co-maintainer:
rpms/ModemManager -- Mobile broadband modem management service ( master f23 f22 )
rpms/NetworkManager -- Network connection manager and user applications ( master f23
f22 )
rpms/NetworkManager-openvpn -- NetworkManager VPN plugin for OpenVPN ( master f23 f22
)
rpms/NetworkManager-pptp -- NetworkManager VPN plugin for PPTP ( master f23 f22 )
rpms/NetworkManager-vpnc -- NetworkManager VPN plugin for vpnc ( master f23 f22 )
rpms/network-manager-applet -- A network control and status applet for NetworkManager
( master f23 f22 )
rpms/wpa_supplicant -- WPA/WPA2/IEEE 802.1X Supplicant ( master f23
f22 )
kevin
9:46 a.m.
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their
email
addresses in FAS). If they're not interested in maintaining or we
can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others
can take them over.
If you have a way to contact this maintainer, please let them
know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
Thanks!
* jklimes - former email: jklimes(a)redhat.com
Jirka last day with Red Hat was right before the holidays (he'll be
missed), so yes this email is no longer active. I'll ask him if he'd
like to continue maintaining packages, but that would of course involve
an email change to his personal one anyway. We might as well remove
jklimes@rh from package maintainership.
Dan
> Point of contact:
>
> rpms/mobile-broadband-provider-info -- Mobile broadband provider
> database ( master f23 f22 )
>
> Co-maintainer:
>
> rpms/ModemManager -- Mobile broadband modem management service (
> master f23 f22 )
> rpms/NetworkManager -- Network connection manager and user
> applications ( master f23 f22 )
> rpms/NetworkManager-openvpn -- NetworkManager VPN plugin for
> OpenVPN ( master f23 f22 )
> rpms/NetworkManager-pptp -- NetworkManager VPN plugin for PPTP (
> master f23 f22 )
> rpms/NetworkManager-vpnc -- NetworkManager VPN plugin for vpnc (
> master f23 f22 )
> rpms/network-manager-applet -- A network control and status
> applet for NetworkManager ( master f23 f22 )
> rpms/wpa_supplicant -- WPA/WPA2/IEEE 802.1X Supplicant ( master
> f23
> f22 )
>
> kevin
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.
> org
11:51 a.m.
On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:46:32 -0600
Dan Williams <dcbw(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their
> email
> addresses in FAS). If they're not interested in maintaining or we
> can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others
> can take them over.
>
> If you have a way to contact this maintainer, please let them
> know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
> Thanks!
>
> * jklimes - former email: jklimes(a)redhat.com
Jirka last day with Red Hat was right before the holidays (he'll be
missed), so yes this email is no longer active. I'll ask him if he'd
like to continue maintaining packages, but that would of course
involve an email change to his personal one anyway. We might as well
remove jklimes@rh from package maintainership.
ok. Do you want me to set the point of contact to you on that package?
Just let me know what you want to do and I can sort out the pkgdb side.
kevin
1:04 p.m.
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:46:32 -0600
Dan Williams <dcbw(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> > interested
> > in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their
> > email
> > addresses in FAS). If they're not interested in maintaining or
> > we
> > can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that
> > others
> > can take them over.
> >
> > If you have a way to contact this maintainer, please let them
> > know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > * jklimes - former email: jklimes(a)redhat.com
>
> Jirka last day with Red Hat was right before the holidays (he'll be
> missed), so yes this email is no longer active. I'll ask him if
> he'd
> like to continue maintaining packages, but that would of course
> involve an email change to his personal one anyway. We might as
> well
> remove jklimes@rh from package maintainership.
ok. Do you want me to set the point of contact to you on that
package?
Actually Lubomir Rintel should get it, he should be on all the other
packages too.
Dan
7:54 a.m.
New subject: Announce of package to mark as Orphan – repoview – rpmdepsize – snake - revisor
Hi everybody,
I would like to set following packages as Orphan due to that upstream is dead or
maintainers do not respond:
repoview
rpmdepsize
snake
revisor
Best regards
Jaroslav Mracek
9:37 a.m.
New subject: Announce of package to mark as Orphan – repoview – rpmdepsize – snake - revisor
On Sex, 2016-01-08 at 08:54 -0500, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
Hi everybody,
I would like to set following packages as Orphan due to that upstream
is dead or maintainers do not respond:
repoview
have we a replace for repoview ?
rpmdepsize
I didn't know the existence of this package and seems interesting but
also seems to me that doesn't work .
snake
revisor
lorax could replace revisor isn't it ?
Best regards
Jaroslav Mracek
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.
org
--
Sérgio M. B.
6:25 p.m.
New subject: Announce of package to mark as Orphan – repoview – rpmdepsize – snake - revisor
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote:
On Sex, 2016-01-08 at 08:54 -0500, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I would like to set following packages as Orphan due to that upstream
> is dead or maintainers do not respond:
>
> repoview
have we a replace for repoview ?
Does anyone actually like it? I find it to be confusing eye candy,
unnecessary and interfering with basic content reviews, compared to a
flat filename based file list. I deliberately exclude "repoview" from
all repository mirrors.
7:15 p.m.
New subject: Announce of package to mark as Orphan – repoview – rpmdepsize – snake - revisor
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Sérgio Basto
<sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote:
> On Sex, 2016-01-08 at 08:54 -0500, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I would like to set following packages as Orphan due to that upstream
>> is dead or maintainers do not respond:
>>
>> repoview
>
> have we a replace for repoview ?
Does anyone actually like it? I find it to be confusing eye candy,
unnecessary and interfering with basic content reviews, compared to a
flat filename based file list. I deliberately exclude "repoview" from
all repository mirrors.
It would be nice if we had a better way to generate pages on packages
in a repository based on the metadata, in a lightweight fashion.
I've kinda poked at it to update it myself[0], but there's stuff that
has to be fixed: the Kid templates need to be replaced, the usage of
SQLite metadata needs to be replaced with parsing the XML data, and
the dependency on yum needs to be killed. The dependency on yum was
easy to kill, as I was able to replace yum.comps with python-libcomps,
but the other stuff is much harder.
[0]: https://gitlab.com/Conan_Kudo/repoview
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
3:37 a.m.
New subject: Announce of package to mark as Orphan – repoview – rpmdepsize – snake - revisor
Am 13.01.2016 um 01:25 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Sérgio Basto
<sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote:
> On Sex, 2016-01-08 at 08:54 -0500, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I would like to set following packages as Orphan due to that upstream
>> is dead or maintainers do not respond:
>>
>> repoview
>
> have we a replace for repoview ?
Does anyone actually like it? I find it to be confusing eye candy,
unnecessary and interfering with basic content reviews, compared to a
flat filename based file list. I deliberately exclude "repoview" from
all repository mirrors
yes, for all internal repos as well as for the cache repo on the
adminserver which deploys updates from dnf-cache to all other servers
2:23 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Dne 6.1.2016 v 01:07 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
If you have a way to contact this maintainer, please let them
know that we'd appreciate knowing what to do with their packages.
Thanks!
* jklimes - former email: jklimes(a)redhat.com
Not sure what will be future of the packages, but in any case, Jiří has
updated his email in FAS.
Vít
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=LTwG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3068
days inactive
3075
days old
9 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Dan Williams -
Jaroslav Mracek -
Kevin Fenzi -
Neal Gompa -
Nico Kadel-Garcia -
Reindl Harald -
Sérgio Basto -
Vít Ondruch