3:20 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
base on a post in the last year on fedora-devel I have
make the following test the the kernel package repository:
$ git clone ssh://s4504kr@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/kernel
$ cd kernel
... Add a Changelog entry in kernel.spec
$git commit -m ...
$git push
I haven't got any error message. But I have expedted to
get one, because I'm not a kernel developer. I'm only a
ordinary provenpackager without any additional access
to the kernel package.
After then I have deleted the kernel directory and
have done a git clone to verify, that my changes was
transfered to the remote repository.
The result is, that the changes sill exist in the repository.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iJwEAQECAAYFAktXc5UACgkQZLAIBz9lVu80YAP9EaVas6dbVpkA0p3CTv2WJxpK
8DHqMPQmRIkpJFJyztS3/KVHcQaATPQetb+lO7158hYIfmHFKa7nFjzNFWnRnyrk
5/T0bxpTh8nZknZvRKm9vFa64EH64pKNaQfFCbnFNkPg+6OPSL5bDmkfbby2sdsY
i7Hag1X5Xb6li50ANEM=
=TWCL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
9:41 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:27:23 -0600, you wrote:
Provenpackagers have write access to the kernel package. What
exactly
do you think has gone wrong here?
OK, I thought that the kernel package was one of the exclussion
of the mass opening process. I have retried the test with the
firefox package. On this package the git push process was
blocked.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.10.0 (Build 500)
Charset: us-ascii
wj8DBQFLWHXOT2AHK6txfgwRAiCYAJ9ewXC62P2xd0a4E90nR46jLbxXNgCcClAl
088zlJ35aqjicgahadZ8mjA=
=6+4i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3:29 p.m.
On 2010-01-20 10:20:33 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
base on a post in the last year on fedora-devel I have
make the following test the the kernel package repository:
$ git clone ssh://s4504kr@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/kernel
$ cd kernel
... Add a Changelog entry in kernel.spec
$git commit -m ...
$git push
I haven't got any error message. But I have expedted to
get one, because I'm not a kernel developer. I'm only a
ordinary provenpackager without any additional access
to the kernel package.
From
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/kernel, it
looks like kernel actually has provenpackager commits on, so this should
be normal. I thought it was one of the exceptions, but apparently not.
Thanks,
Ricky
9:43 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 16:29 -0500, Ricky Zhou wrote:
From https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/kernel, it
looks like kernel actually has provenpackager commits on, so this should
be normal. I thought it was one of the exceptions, but apparently not.
Did we grant _any_ exceptions? :)
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse(a)intel.com Intel Corporation
3:31 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 22:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
I haven't got any error message. But I have expedted to
get one, because I'm not a kernel developer. I'm only a
ordinary provenpackager without any additional access
to the kernel package.
Kernel is open to provenpackager, so it makes sense that you were able
to commit to it.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/kernel
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
6:27 p.m.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:31:45PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 22:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> I haven't got any error message. But I have expedted to
> get one, because I'm not a kernel developer. I'm only a
> ordinary provenpackager without any additional access
> to the kernel package.
>
>
Kernel is open to provenpackager, so it makes sense that you were able
to commit to it.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/kernel
Right. We review commits to the cvs tree as the diffs hit the mailing list,
so cluebatting would happen fairly quickly if necessary (though until now,
no-one who wasn't already explicitly approved in the kernel acl
has committed anything afaik).
The git tree commit went unnoticed because the commitdiff hook isn't
wired up yet.
Dave
1:08 a.m.
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 06:27:18 pm Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:31:45PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 22:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> > I haven't got any error message. But I have expedted to
> > get one, because I'm not a kernel developer. I'm only a
> > ordinary provenpackager without any additional access
> > to the kernel package.
>
> Kernel is open to provenpackager, so it makes sense that you were able
> to commit to it.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/kernel
Right. We review commits to the cvs tree as the diffs hit the mailing list,
so cluebatting would happen fairly quickly if necessary (though until now,
no-one who wasn't already explicitly approved in the kernel acl
has committed anything afaik).
The git tree commit went unnoticed because the commitdiff hook isn't
wired up yet.
Dave
I would be the only one not explicitly on the list that has commited. but all
of my commits have been sparc specifc ones.
Dennis
5236
days inactive
5237
days old
8 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Dave Jones -
David Woodhouse -
Dennis Gilmore -
Jason L Tibbitts III -
Jesse Keating -
Jochen Schmitt -
Jon Stanley -
Ricky Zhou