2:40 a.m.
Hello,
I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
change was already announced in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5.
Best regards
Jaroslav Mracek
8:34 a.m.
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
Hello,
I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
change was already announced in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/
ReplaceDnfWithDnf5.
This is quite an ambitious schedule. Bugs filed yesterday against
packages using dnf, for a change that is planned in 7 days time. And
'dnf download' is not as featureful as the old version of dnf so it
really does require deeper changes to supermin.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
8:48 a.m.
V Wed, May 24, 2023 at 02:34:57PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
> rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
> change was already announced in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/
> ReplaceDnfWithDnf5.
This is quite an ambitious schedule. Bugs filed yesterday against
packages using dnf, for a change that is planned in 7 days time.
If I understand the change correctly, packages are expected to RPM-depend on
"dnf5", but to execute "dnf" command. That means the bugs are not
actionable
until the change is implemented in dnf5.
-- Petr
4:47 a.m.
On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
Hello,
I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
change was already announced in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5>;.
It seem rawhide copr builds are broken...
To reproduce, try:
$ COPR=whatever
$ copr create $COPR
--repo='http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/$basearch/'
--chroot fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --delete-after-days 7
$ copr add-package-distgit $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster --commit rawhide
$ copr build-package $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster
See https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/whatever/builds/
I get:
...
Finish(bootstrap): dnf install
Start(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
Start: chroot init
INFO: mounting tmpfs at /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root.
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 3.5
INFO: Mock Version: 3.5
Start: dnf install
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
information about the arguments.
ERROR:
Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-0s4wy2p4/dummy-test-package-gloster/dummy-test-package-gloster.spec)
Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 26 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M fb947d9bf50448af8a0250f849d154de -D
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1685094318.073555/root -a
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4as66jul:/etc/resolv.conf
--console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash
--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/installation-homedir
--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"
--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8
--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0
--setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/ --releasever 39
--setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local
--disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
information about the arguments.
Copr build error: Mock build failed
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
4:51 a.m.
On 26. 05. 23 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
> rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
> change was already announced in
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5>;.
It seem rawhide copr builds are broken...
To reproduce, try:
$ COPR=whatever
$ copr create $COPR
--repo='http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/$basearch/'
--chroot fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --delete-after-days 7
$ copr add-package-distgit $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster --commit
rawhide
$ copr build-package $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster
See https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/whatever/builds/
I get:
...
Finish(bootstrap): dnf install
Start(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
Start: chroot init
INFO: mounting tmpfs at
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root.
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 3.5
INFO: Mock Version: 3.5
Start: dnf install
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
information about the arguments.
ERROR:
Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-0s4wy2p4/dummy-test-package-gloster/dummy-test-package-gloster.spec)
Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 26 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M fb947d9bf50448af8a0250f849d154de -D
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1685094318.073555/root -a
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4as66jul:/etc/resolv.conf
--console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash
--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/installation-homedir
--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"
--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8
--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0
--setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/ --releasever 39
--setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk
--disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
information about the arguments.
Copr build error: Mock build failed
OK, Koji is broken as well, this is not limited to Copr.
See e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101549275
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9276/101549276/root.log
...
DEBUG util.py:443: Unknown argument "groupinstall" for command
"dnf5". Add
"--help" for more information about the arguments.
DEBUG util.py:596: Child return code was: 2
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
4:56 a.m.
On 26. 05. 23 11:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 05. 23 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
>> rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
>> change was already announced in
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5
>> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5>;.
>
> It seem rawhide copr builds are broken...
>
> To reproduce, try:
>
> $ COPR=whatever
> $ copr create $COPR
> --repo='http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/$basearch/'
> --chroot fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --delete-after-days 7
> $ copr add-package-distgit $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster --commit
> rawhide
> $ copr build-package $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster
>
> See https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/whatever/builds/
>
> I get:
>
> ...
> Finish(bootstrap): dnf install
> Start(bootstrap): creating root cache
> Finish(bootstrap): creating root cache
> Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
> Start: chroot init
> INFO: mounting tmpfs at
> /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root.
> INFO: calling preinit hooks
> INFO: enabled root cache
> INFO: enabled package manager cache
> Start: cleaning package manager metadata
> Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
> INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
> Mock Version: 3.5
> INFO: Mock Version: 3.5
> Start: dnf install
> Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
> information about the arguments.
> WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
> Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
> information about the arguments.
> WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
> Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
> information about the arguments.
> ERROR:
>
Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-0s4wy2p4/dummy-test-package-gloster/dummy-test-package-gloster.spec)
Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 26 seconds
> INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
> INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
> Start: clean chroot
> INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
> Finish: clean chroot
> ERROR: Command failed:
> # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M fb947d9bf50448af8a0250f849d154de -D
> /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1685094318.073555/root -a
> --capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240
> --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4as66jul:/etc/resolv.conf
> --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash
>
--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/installation-homedir
--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"
--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8
--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0
--setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/ --releasever 39
--setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk
--disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
> Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more
> information about the arguments.
>
> Copr build error: Mock build failed
OK, Koji is broken as well, this is not limited to Copr.
See e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101549275
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9276/101549276/root.log
...
DEBUG util.py:443: Unknown argument "groupinstall" for command
"dnf5". Add
"--help" for more information about the arguments.
DEBUG util.py:596: Child return code was: 2
I've requested the update to be untagged in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11441
Please ship this change by means that will not distrupt the work of all others
unnecessarily.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
1:51 a.m.
Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto:
Hello,
I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF
in rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of
May. The change was already announced in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5.
Best regards
Jaroslav Mracek
I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like the
following:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by
libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635
Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a
single one and dnf5 can't understand them?
Mattia
9:46 a.m.
I am really sorry but this doesn't sound like a problem of DNF or DNF5. DNF and DNF5
uses the same solver therefore I do not expect any difference in behavior. May I ask you
to verify the behavior with DNF first?
12:08 p.m.
Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto:
I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like the
following:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by
libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635
Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a
single one and dnf5 can't understand them?
Mattia
The package is broken
$ sudo dnf --enablerepo u*g install libXISF-devel
Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 28 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00
Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.6 MB/s | 5.1 MB 00:03
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Mon 29 May 2023 18:06:51 BST.
Dependencies resolved.
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by
libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates-testing
2:20 p.m.
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:08 +0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto:
>
> I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like
> the
> following:
>
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by
> libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635
>
> Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a
> single one and dnf5 can't understand them?
>
> Mattia
The package is broken
$ sudo dnf --enablerepo u*g install libXISF-devel
Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 28 kB/s | 14 kB
00:00
Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.6 MB/s | 5.1 MB
00:03
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Mon 29 May 2023
18:06:51 BST.
Dependencies resolved.
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by libXISF-
devel-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates-testing
The dependency is auto-generated, it's not the packager's fault. I
suspect the ultimate cause is this upstream:
https://gitea.nouspiro.space/nou/libXISF/commit/1c0d6e4e054f1c5ac461e6da3...
which causes the pkgconfig file to have this line:
Requires.private: lz4;pugixml;zlib
(you can see that line
in https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/libXISF/0.2.5/1.fc38/x86_...
). That's what our dependency generator turns into
`pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib)`. I'll file an upstream issue.
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw(a)fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
4:33 p.m.
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:08 +0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto:
> >
> > I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like
> > the
> > following:
> >
> > Error:
> > Problem: conflicting requests
> > - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by
> > libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635
> >
> > Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a
> > single one and dnf5 can't understand them?
> >
> > Mattia
>
> The package is broken
>
> $ sudo dnf --enablerepo u*g install libXISF-devel
> Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 28 kB/s | 14 kB
> 00:00
> Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.6 MB/s | 5.1 MB
> 00:03
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Mon 29 May 2023
> 18:06:51 BST.
> Dependencies resolved.
>
> Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
> - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by libXISF-
> devel-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates-testing
The dependency is auto-generated, it's not the packager's fault. I
suspect the ultimate cause is this upstream:
https://gitea.nouspiro.space/nou/libXISF/commit/1c0d6e4e054f1c5ac461e6da3...
which causes the pkgconfig file to have this line:
Requires.private: lz4;pugixml;zlib
(you can see that line
in https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/libXISF/0.2.5/1.fc38/x86_...
). That's what our dependency generator turns into
`pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib)`. I'll file an upstream issue.
Upstream fixed this very quickly (thanks Dušan!) and I'm doing -2
builds with the fix backported now. Will edit the updates.
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw(a)fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
1:30 a.m.
Il 29/05/23 23:33, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:08 +0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
>>> Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto:
>>>
>>> I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like
>>> the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> Error:
>>> Problem: conflicting requests
>>> - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by
>>> libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635
>>>
>>> Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a
>>> single one and dnf5 can't understand them?
>>>
>>> Mattia
>> The package is broken
>>
>> $ sudo dnf --enablerepo u*g install libXISF-devel
>> Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 28 kB/s | 14 kB
>> 00:00
>> Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.6 MB/s | 5.1 MB
>> 00:03
>> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Mon 29 May 2023
>> 18:06:51 BST.
>> Dependencies resolved.
>>
>> Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
>> - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by libXISF-
>> devel-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates-testing
> The dependency is auto-generated, it's not the packager's fault. I
> suspect the ultimate cause is this upstream:
>
>
https://gitea.nouspiro.space/nou/libXISF/commit/1c0d6e4e054f1c5ac461e6da3...
>
> which causes the pkgconfig file to have this line:
>
> Requires.private: lz4;pugixml;zlib
>
> (you can see that line
>
in https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/libXISF/0.2.5/1.fc38/x86_...
> ). That's what our dependency generator turns into
> `pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib)`. I'll file an upstream issue.
Upstream fixed this very quickly (thanks Dušan!) and I'm doing -2
builds with the fix backported now. Will edit the updates.
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw(a)fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
Thank you Adam!
Indeed, I should have looked into the problem more carefully before
pointing my finger against dnf5.
Mattia
332
days inactive
338
days old
11 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Adam Williamson -
Jaroslav Mracek -
Leigh Scott -
Mattia Verga -
Miro Hrončok -
Petr Pisar -
Richard W.M. Jones