The xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo is supposed to have been retired (see <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187060#c4>). How can I check if this is actually the case?

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:56 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > The xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo is supposed to have been retired (see > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187060#c4>). How can I > check if this is actually the case? It's not, if you look at the tags at the bottom there should be a red check mark against the f39 tag: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=20127 I filed this issue at the time it has issues: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11388 It's allegedly a problem here: https://pagure.io/rpkg/issue/685 II did actually note that in your bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187060#c6

* Peter Robinson: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:56 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> The xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo is supposed to have been retired (see >> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187060#c4>). How can I >> check if this is actually the case? > > It's not, if you look at the tags at the bottom there should be a red > check mark against the f39 tag: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=20127 > > I filed this issue at the time it has issues: > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11388 > > It's allegedly a problem here: > https://pagure.io/rpkg/issue/685 > > II did actually note that in your bug report: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187060#c6 Sorry, it's still not clear to me if the dead.package stuff is an optional step of retirement to reflect it in dist-git to make it more noticeable (if all you do is a fedpkg clone), or the core criteria for retirement. Or put differently, if I want to fix this, can I just push a dead.package file myself, as a provenpackager?

Ahh, and the Koji indicator is that the package owner is set to orphan?

* Peter Robinson: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:58 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> * Peter Robinson: >> >> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:56 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >> The xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo is supposed to have been retired (see >> >> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187060#c4>). How can I >> >> check if this is actually the case? >> > >> > It's not, if you look at the tags at the bottom there should be a red >> > check mark against the f39 tag: >> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=20127 >> > >> > I filed this issue at the time it has issues: >> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11388 >> > >> > It's allegedly a problem here: >> > https://pagure.io/rpkg/issue/685 >> > >> > II did actually note that in your bug report: >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187060#c6 >> >> Sorry, it's still not clear to me if the dead.package stuff is an >> optional step of retirement to reflect it in dist-git to make it more >> noticeable (if all you do is a fedpkg clone), or the core criteria for >> retirement. >> >> Or put differently, if I want to fix this, can I just push a >> dead.package file myself, as a provenpackager? > > A dead.package is not the only piece required, there's koji commands > required to block the package that are run as part of the git commit > scripts, you won't have the appropriate ACLs to run those manually so > the rpkg problem needs to be fixed. I have run it again for that > package and it mostly appears to have worked but there was one error > but it make take some time for that to be clear if it worked behind > the scenes with various cron job style scripts. Ahh, and the Koji indicator is that the package owner is set to orphan?