* Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: beagle-owner AT fedoraproject DOT org Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (state 14). * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name shows more than a dozen people on watchcommit+commit, but no package owner. It's an orphan. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs shows more than a dozen open tickets, but nobody is subscribed to watchbugzilla. * "yum list beagle" shows beagle-0.3.9-6.fc11 in "fedora".

On 07/14/2009 04:16 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:48:33 +0200, Michael wrote: > >> * Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: >> >>      beagle-owner AT fedoraproject DOT org >> >>      Recipient address rejected: >>      User unknown in local recipient table (state 14). >> >> * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name  shows more than a >> dozen people on watchcommit+commit, but no package owner. It's an orphan. >> >> * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs  shows more than a >> dozen open tickets, but nobody is subscribed to watchbugzilla. >> >> * "yum list beagle" shows beagle-0.3.9-6.fc11 in "fedora". > > There is still no beagle-owner for this package. > So, it looks like the desktop team isn't interested in picking up beagle (and they're most of the people in the commit/watchcommit) for the package.  If no one else is willing to take ownership, I think we should block the package for rawhide and list it as retired for not having someone interested in working on it.

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:07 AM, drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi&lt;a.badger(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > On 07/14/2009 04:16 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:48:33 +0200, Michael wrote: > >> > >>> * Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > >>> > >>>      beagle-owner AT fedoraproject DOT org > >>> > >>>      Recipient address rejected: > >>>      User unknown in local recipient table (state 14). > >>> > >>> * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name  shows more than > >>> a > >>> dozen people on watchcommit+commit, but no package owner. It's an > >>> orphan. > >>> > >>> * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs  shows more than > >>> a > >>> dozen open tickets, but nobody is subscribed to watchbugzilla. > >>> > >>> * "yum list beagle" shows beagle-0.3.9-6.fc11 in "fedora". > >> > >> There is still no beagle-owner for this package. > >> > > So, it looks like the desktop team isn't interested in picking up beagle > > (and they're most of the people in the commit/watchcommit) for the > > package.  If no one else is willing to take ownership, I think we should > > block the package for rawhide and list it as retired for not having > > someone interested in working on it. > > It does not even build on rawhide right now (epiphany related breakage). > > I dropped it due to lack of time (which is worse rather than better > now) but nobody responded to my mail where I was searching for a new > maintainer. > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list As a beagle user, I'd like to help co-maintain it (Or maintain it if noone else is interested), What would I have to do?

Juan just took ownership of beagle, so the issue (not having a maintainer) is solved now.