apt-fast - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

apt-fast

libdrm vs mesa updates - update...

Any takers for gpsdrive ?

A. Mani

Monday, 18 January 2010 Mon, 18 Jan '10

9:57 a.m.

See http://www.pclinuxos.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=3t030sj3bgqk77dgetcvtu... can it be packaged for Fedora? Best A. Mani -- A. Mani ASL, CLC, AMS, CMS http://www.logicamani.co.cc

Reply

Show replies by date

Josephine Tannhäuser

Monday, 18 January Mon, 18 Jan

10:07 a.m.

should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt 2010/1/18, A. Mani <a.mani.cms(a)gmail.com>:

See http://www.pclinuxos.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=3t030sj3bgqk77dgetcvtu... can it be packaged for Fedora? Best A. Mani -- A. Mani ASL, CLC, AMS, CMS http://www.logicamani.co.cc -- devel mailing list devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE

Reply

Seth Vidal

10:09 a.m.

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:

should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt

unless I'm reading that forum thread wrong - it sure seems like apt-fast requires axel's repo? If that's true then I think it nixes any chance of the pkg getting into fedora. -sv

Reply

Panu Matilainen

11:02 a.m.

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Seth Vidal wrote:

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote: > should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt > unless I'm reading that forum thread wrong - it sure seems like apt-fast requires axel's repo? If that's true then I think it nixes any chance of the pkg getting into fedora.

The reference to "axel" appears to be about this download accelerator project: http://axel.alioth.debian.org/ and it's already packaged in Fedora too. Other than that I dunno... - Panu -

Reply

Conrad Meyer

3:36 p.m.

On Monday 18 January 2010 08:07:44 am Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:

should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt

I thought apt-rpm was broken since the rpm 4.7.x (or is that the right version) changes? Regards, -- Conrad Meyer <cemeyer(a)u.washington.edu>

Reply

Ralf Corsepius

Tuesday, 19 January Tue, 19 Jan

1:28 a.m.

On 01/18/2010 10:36 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:

On Monday 18 January 2010 08:07:44 am Josephine Tannhäuser wrote: > should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt I thought apt-rpm was broken since the rpm 4.7.x (or is that the right version) changes?

It was broken for quite a while, but meanwhile it is quite usable again. Ralf

Reply

5262

days inactive

5263

days old

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Manage subscription

5 comments

6 participants

tags (0)

participants (6)

A. Mani
Conrad Meyer
Josephine Tannhäuser
Panu Matilainen
Ralf Corsepius
Seth Vidal