On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The end result would be that we don't show applications that
have
failed the previous two releases mass rebuilds in GNOME Software i.e.
we don't show f19 packages in f21, and we don't show f20 packages in
f22. Should be pretty non-controversial, right? The kind of software
that failed two rebuilds in a row really and is sitting unloved by the
downstream maintainer isn't really the kind of software we want to
show. They would still of course be installable on the command line
using dnf.
We generally actually drop packages from the distro that have been
FTBFS for two releases so I'm not sure it should make much difference
but some third party repos don't necessarily rebuild as often so you
might end up excluding useful tools/codecs etc
Peter