Yes, exactly, this is based on an audit of actual source file licenses
via a combination of licensecheck and manual inspection.
I listed the full details in a spec file comment, but basically, the
files that are sources for the compiled binaries are either (LGPLv2 or
LGPLv3) or GPLv3, so the binaries are GPLv3 overall. All files that are
installed directly from the source tree, like API headers and examples,
are also GPLv3 only. Therefore, everything in the binary RPMs is GPLv3.
- Ben
On 11/2/21 17:20, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:06 PM Tomasz Torcz <tomek(a)pipebreaker.pl
> <mailto:tomek@pipebreaker.pl>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:26:52PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > The License field of wlcs has been corrected from “GPLv2 or GPLv3” to
> > “GPLv3”.
>
>
https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs
> <
https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs> (is this the right repo?) contains
> both COPYING.GPL2 and COPYING.GPL3. How did you determine correct
> license?
>
>
> I am guessing based on the actual license listed in the source files.
> Looking through some of them (such as
>
https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/blob/master/src/primary_selection.cpp
> <
https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/blob/master/src/primary_selection.cpp>),
> some only list GPLv3 while others list GPLv3 or GPLv2 - so the files
> that are only licensed under GPLv3 means it should be GPLv3 only.
>
> -Ian
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>