Quoting Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.com&gt;: The address is incorrect and should be http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/x86_6... Xen directory is indeed not available. Perhaps it has been moved. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Project contributor http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/LuyaTshimbalanga

Quoting Naoki <naoki(a)valuecommerce.com&gt;: http://redhat.download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/core/6/x86_64//... > So, if it has gone, which I suspect is the case because there wouldn't > be any other logical location for it, then when is he coming back? Could it be merge with pxeboot directory? http://mirror.hiwaay.net/redhat/fedora/linux/core/development/x86_64//os/... Maybe xen maintainer needs to be asked -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Project contributor http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/LuyaTshimbalanga

On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 10:24 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: And not really helping matters at all is the fact that the upstream xen-unstable code base was still on 2.6.16 up until about two weeks ago. They're now up to 2.6.18, but that's still significantly behind the 2.6.20-rc that rawhide is tracking. This just ends up being another example of why we are so "upstream, upstream, upstream!" focused[1]. Jeremy [1] Since in this case, where we compromised on the upstream angle, we are now in a position where our users suffer because the upstream for Xen doesn't track the upstream of the kernel well enough. And the work to do so takes a significant amount of time.