9:24 a.m.
There are two recent kernels built in Koji:
kernel-2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10
kernel-2.6.28.1-17.fc10
So, is F10 on the 2.6.27 track, or on the 2.6.28 track?
Thanks!
9:32 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:24:50PM +0000, Jack Tanner wrote:
There are two recent kernels built in Koji:
kernel-2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10
kernel-2.6.28.1-17.fc10
So, is F10 on the 2.6.27 track, or on the 2.6.28 track?
2.6.28 is coming, 2.6.27 in the near term for low-risk immediate
fixes.
regards, Kyle
11:25 a.m.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Kyle McMartin <kyle(a)mcmartin.ca> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:24:50PM +0000, Jack Tanner wrote:
> There are two recent kernels built in Koji:
>
> kernel-2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10
> kernel-2.6.28.1-17.fc10
>
> So, is F10 on the 2.6.27 track, or on the 2.6.28 track?
>
2.6.28 is coming, 2.6.27 in the near term for low-risk immediate
fixes.
regards, Kyle
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
You can get a 2.6.28 fc10 kernel from koji
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8)
Ted
11:54 a.m.
Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:24:50PM +0000, Jack Tanner wrote:
> There are two recent kernels built in Koji:
>
> kernel-2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10
> kernel-2.6.28.1-17.fc10
>
> So, is F10 on the 2.6.27 track, or on the 2.6.28 track?
>
2.6.28 is coming, 2.6.27 in the near term for low-risk immediate
fixes.
I don't suppose any of those fixes would relate to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478878 or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475495 (i.e. people that
/can't boot new kernels/)?
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
"Inches: An antiquated measurement unit still in use in certain
backwards countries with incredibly low-cost computer equipment."
-- groff documentation
3:14 p.m.
2009/1/21 Kyle McMartin <kyle(a)mcmartin.ca>:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:24:50PM +0000, Jack Tanner wrote:
> There are two recent kernels built in Koji:
>
> kernel-2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10
> kernel-2.6.28.1-17.fc10
>
> So, is F10 on the 2.6.27 track, or on the 2.6.28 track?
>
2.6.28 is coming, 2.6.27 in the near term for low-risk immediate
fixes.
regards, Kyle
Does this include f9?
7:29 p.m.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:14:41PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
2009/1/21 Kyle McMartin <kyle(a)mcmartin.ca>:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:24:50PM +0000, Jack Tanner wrote:
>> There are two recent kernels built in Koji:
>>
>> kernel-2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10
>> kernel-2.6.28.1-17.fc10
>>
>> So, is F10 on the 2.6.27 track, or on the 2.6.28 track?
>>
>
> 2.6.28 is coming, 2.6.27 in the near term for low-risk immediate
> fixes.
>
> regards, Kyle
>
Does this include f9?
To my knowledge, not soon. .28 kernel mode setting and the X version
in F9 don't get along.
josh
7:17 a.m.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Joshua C. <joshuacov(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
2009/1/22 Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)gmail.com>:
> To my knowledge, not soon. .28 kernel mode setting and the X version
> in F9 don't get along.
>
> josh
>
Maybe it's time to go to f10. But I still have problems with this mode setting.
you can disable it (pass no modset to the kernel) and fill a bug to get it fixed
2:03 a.m.
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 10:32 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:24:50PM +0000, Jack Tanner wrote:
> There are two recent kernels built in Koji:
>
> kernel-2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10
> kernel-2.6.28.1-17.fc10
>
> So, is F10 on the 2.6.27 track, or on the 2.6.28 track?
>
2.6.28 is coming, 2.6.27 in the near term for low-risk immediate
fixes.
Ah - the plan has changed:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-kernel-list/2009-January/msg00098....
F10 is going to get 2.6.29. There are some 2.6.29-rc3 builds in koji
already.
Cheers,
Mark.
5566
days inactive
5575
days old
9 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
drago01 -
Jack Tanner -
Josh Boyer -
Joshua C. -
Kyle McMartin -
Mark McLoughlin -
Matej Cepl -
Matthew Woehlke -
Ted Toth