1 p.m.
Is there anything I can help (main packaging related or triage/bug
fix) regarding GNOME in Fedora?
--
Nelson Marques
// I've stopped trying to understand sandwiches with a third piece of
bread in the middle...
2:48 p.m.
On 03/10/2012 02:00 PM, Nelson Marques wrote:
Is there anything I can help (main packaging related or triage/bug
fix) regarding GNOME in Fedora?
Hey, I was actually about to send a mail that intersects with your request.
Take a look at this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=connection_closed_cb
Those 60+ f16 rhythmbox bugs are all likely dupes of:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739779
which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not sure why abrt couldn't handle
the other 60 though...) It ain't glamorous, but all those extra bugs should
probably just be duped to that report.
The issue is rhythmbox crashes at shutdown quite regularly: doesn't impact app
usage really but certainly is wasting time of concerned users who are
submitting abrt reports.
If anyone with rhythmbox access would like to push a build, this is fixed
upstream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670666
http://git.gnome.org/browse/rhythmbox/commit/?id=26c69b2d7d68fa0e4269fce1...
I think f17 needs the fix as well.
Thanks,
Cole
8:49 p.m.
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not sure why abrt
couldn't handle
the other 60 though...) It ain't glamorous, but all those extra bugs should
probably just be duped to that report.
You could do that in about ten seconds with python-bugzilla, I think.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
9:03 p.m.
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 18:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not sure why abrt couldn't handle
> the other 60 though...) It ain't glamorous, but all those extra bugs should
> probably just be duped to that report.
You could do that in about ten seconds with python-bugzilla, I think.
Huh. I take that back. Seems neither python-bugzilla nor Bugzilla's own
'modify several bugs at once' page is capable of marking multiple bugs
as duplicates of one other bug. You can close a big set of bugs with any
other resolution, but DUPLICATE does not appear to be possible.
Interesting.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
8:49 a.m.
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 19:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 18:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>
> > which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not sure why abrt couldn't
handle
> > the other 60 though...) It ain't glamorous, but all those extra bugs
should
> > probably just be duped to that report.
>
> You could do that in about ten seconds with python-bugzilla, I think.
Huh. I take that back. Seems neither python-bugzilla nor Bugzilla's own
'modify several bugs at once' page is capable of marking multiple bugs
as duplicates of one other bug. You can close a big set of bugs with any
other resolution, but DUPLICATE does not appear to be possible.
Interesting.
I actually have a patch for this in my local copy of python-bugzilla,
so, thank you for reminding me to get that upstreamed. Bug filed:
https://fedorahosted.org/python-bugzilla/ticket/40
- ajax
1:11 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:49:18AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 19:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 18:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 15:48 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > which has a lot of people tacked on as well (not sure why abrt
couldn't handle
> > > the other 60 though...) It ain't glamorous, but all those extra bugs
should
> > > probably just be duped to that report.
> >
> > You could do that in about ten seconds with python-bugzilla, I think.
>
> Huh. I take that back. Seems neither python-bugzilla nor Bugzilla's own
> 'modify several bugs at once' page is capable of marking multiple bugs
> as duplicates of one other bug. You can close a big set of bugs with any
> other resolution, but DUPLICATE does not appear to be possible.
> Interesting.
I actually have a patch for this in my local copy of python-bugzilla,
so, thank you for reminding me to get that upstreamed. Bug filed:
https://fedorahosted.org/python-bugzilla/ticket/40
We should ask Will Woods when we can expect a new release -- it's been
~9 months since the last one, and several fixes I'd like are either in
the repo or waiting in tickets. This is a great one, thanks ajax.
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
1:29 p.m.
On 12.3.2012 03:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
> You could do that in about ten seconds with python-bugzilla, I
think.
Huh. I take that back. Seems neither python-bugzilla nor Bugzilla's own
'modify several bugs at once' page is capable of marking multiple bugs
as duplicates of one other bug. You can close a big set of bugs with any
other resolution, but DUPLICATE does not appear to be possible.
Interesting.
https://gitorious.org/addon-sdk/mass-close-duplicates should do it. If
it works with currently supported Firefox, I don't know.
Matěj
4483
days inactive
4485
days old
6 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Adam Jackson -
Adam Williamson -
Cole Robinson -
Matej Cepl -
Nelson Marques -
Paul W. Frields