6:58 a.m.
Hardly might seem that we need yet another database, but it looks like
sqlite is rapidly becoming very popular. Being 'lite', it really serves a
different need than others. I think it would be a good addition to fedora.
7:35 a.m.
André Kelpe wrote:
Am Mi, den 06.10.2004 schrieb Rex Dieter um 14:15:
[sqlite]
>-> Fedora Extras
Why that?
Because that's how Fedora Core/Extras generally works. Put new items
into Extras, and if it's succesfully deployed and popular there, it'll
be a good candidate for Core inclusion.
-- Rex
8:19 a.m.
Rex Dieter wrote:
Neal D. Becker wrote:
> Hardly might seem that we need yet another database, but it looks like
> sqlite is rapidly becoming very popular. Being 'lite', it really
> serves a
> different need than others. I think it would be a good addition to
> fedora.
Agreed. Having finally had a chance to use it on a project, it is
definitely quite useful (though I have a couple of small gripes).
-> Fedora Extras
I'm willing to package if you like. I'm [finally] going to have some
more free time from next week so I can start work on it then.
Cheers
--
Stuart
8:23 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:19:45PM +0100, Stuart Children wrote:
>-> Fedora Extras
I'm willing to package if you like. I'm [finally] going to have some
more free time from next week so I can start work on it then.
It already there: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1766
Adrian
8:34 a.m.
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:23:58 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:19:45PM +0100, Stuart Children wrote:
> >-> Fedora Extras
>
> I'm willing to package if you like. I'm [finally] going to have some
> more free time from next week so I can start work on it then.
It already there: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1766
It's been in fedora.us "stable" since 2003-07-01. Above ticket is
just an update request which Nils could do without QA according to
http://www.fedora.us/wiki/PUBLISHCriteria
A package request for python-sqlite is here:
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2000
There's no SQLite 3 request, though.
--
Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) - Linux 2.6.8-1.521
loadavg: 1.67 1.18 1.08
12:14 p.m.
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 15:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:23:58 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:19:45PM +0100, Stuart Children wrote:
> > >-> Fedora Extras
> >
> > I'm willing to package if you like. I'm [finally] going to have some
> > more free time from next week so I can start work on it then.
>
> It already there: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1766
There's no SQLite 3 request, though.
FWIW: Last weekend I tried to build SQLite3 on FC2. It fails its own
testsuite (make test), which caused me not to submit it to FE.
Ralf
12:19 p.m.
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 15:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:23:58 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:19:45PM +0100, Stuart Children wrote:
>>
>>>>-> Fedora Extras
>>>
>>>I'm willing to package if you like. I'm [finally] going to have some
>>>more free time from next week so I can start work on it then.
>>
>>It already there: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1766
>There's no SQLite 3 request, though.
FWIW: Last weekend I tried to build SQLite3 on FC2. It fails its own
testsuite (make test), which caused me not to submit it to FE.
IMO, Submit it anyway... so more folks/eyes can look at it. Feel free
to mark it as NEEDSWORK (instead of QA).
-- Rex
3:15 a.m.
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 19:19, Rex Dieter wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 15:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>There's no SQLite 3 request, though.
>
>
> FWIW: Last weekend I tried to build SQLite3 on FC2. It fails its own
> testsuite (make test), which caused me not to submit it to FE.
IMO, Submit it anyway... so more folks/eyes can look at it. Feel free
to mark it as NEEDSWORK (instead of QA).
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2135
I put it into unstable instead and applied a specfile hack to pass-by
the %check breakdown. I am not really interested into this package, so
somebody else might want to dive into the details ;)
Ralf
7:35 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:58:28AM -0400, Neal D. Becker wrote:
Hardly might seem that we need yet another database, but it looks
like
sqlite is rapidly becoming very popular. Being 'lite', it really serves a
different need than others. I think it would be a good addition to fedora.
Possibly, but it probably fits in with PHP5 and thus FC4 or later. FC3 is
approaching test3 which makes changing/adding packages a bit tricky. Losing
them if we run out of disk space might occur I guess
10:27 a.m.
Alan Cox wrote :
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:58:28AM -0400, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> Hardly might seem that we need yet another database, but it looks like
> sqlite is rapidly becoming very popular. Being 'lite', it really
> serves a different need than others. I think it would be a good
> addition to fedora.
Possibly, but it probably fits in with PHP5 and thus FC4 or later. FC3 is
approaching test3 which makes changing/adding packages a bit tricky.
Losing them if we run out of disk space might occur I guess
Last I checked the sqlite PHP module, the source actually contained its own
snapshot of sqlite, thus didn't require any external library, so including
or not sqlite is a non issue wrt PHP, except maybe to have external tools
to manipulate the sqlite files. This may have changed, though, I think it's
been a while ;-)
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 2.91 (FC3 Test 2) - Linux kernel 2.6.8-1.521.dell
Load : 1.01 0.53 0.47
10:44 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:58:28AM -0400, Neal D. Becker wrote:
Hardly might seem that we need yet another database, but it looks
like
sqlite is rapidly becoming very popular. Being 'lite', it really serves a
different need than others. I think it would be a good addition to fedora.
I saw it contributed a good screenful of GCC warnings to the PHP5 build
too, which was nice...
joe
10:05 p.m.
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 07:58 -0400, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> I think it would be a good addition to fedora.
A big problem with it is that it is thoroughly and utterly 32-bit only.
I looked into porting it to non-x86 and non-32bit systems, and it would
be a whole lot of work.
Can you clarify what 'utterly 32bit only means'.
Does it mean can't adress >2GB files ?
Apple on 64bit-PPC is shipping sqlite alongwith its Tiger release next year
Mozilla/Firefox/Thunderbird are moving to using sqlite as their storage
subsystems and they run on non x86 and 64bit systems
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261861
7155
days inactive
7157
days old
14 comments
12 participants
participants (12)
-
Adrian Reber -
Alan Cox -
André Kelpe -
Bryan O'Sullivan -
Joe Orton -
Matthias Saou -
Michael Schwendt -
Neal Becker -
Ralf Corsepius -
Rex Dieter -
Stuart Children -
Yusuf Goolamabbas