Op woensdag 01-07-2009 om 21:02 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Ville
Skyttä:
Hello,
I noticed a bunch of mingw32*-debuginfo packages that contain only *.debug (no
sources, no build id) appeared in Rawhide. Is this how mingw32 debuginfo
packages are supposed to look like, or is the infrastructure for creating the
debuginfo packages not quite complete, or are these packaging bugs?
mingw32-boost-debuginfo-1.39.0-2.fc12.noarch
mingw32-cairomm-debuginfo-1.8.0-3.fc12.noarch
mingw32-glib2-debuginfo-2.21.2-2.fc12.noarch
mingw32-glibmm24-debuginfo-2.20.0-4.fc12.noarch
mingw32-gtkmm24-debuginfo-2.16.0-2.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libglade2-debuginfo-2.6.4-3.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libglademm24-debuginfo-2.6.7-7.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libgnurx-debuginfo-2.5.1-5.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libsigc++20-debuginfo-2.2.2-8.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libsqlite3x-debuginfo-20071018-8.fc12.noarch
mingw32-libxml++-debuginfo-2.26.0-2.fc12.noarch
mingw32-pangomm-debuginfo-2.24.0-3.fc12.noarch
mingw32-plotmm-debuginfo-0.1.2-3.fc12.noarch
mingw32-qt-debuginfo-4.5.2-1.fc12.noarch
mingw32-qwt-debuginfo-5.1.1-8.fc12.noarch
mingw32-sqlite-debuginfo-3.6.14.2-1.fc12.noarch
mingw32-tcl-debuginfo-8.5.7-6.fc12.noarch
mingw32-wpcap-debuginfo-4.1.beta5-6.fc12.noarch
mingw32-zfstream-debuginfo-20041202-6.fc12.noarch
Hi,
The implementation of mingw32 debuginfo packages has recently been
discussed on the Fedora-MinGW mailing list:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-June/001613.html
At the moment we just started experimenting with it in rawhide and we
haven't really got to thorough testing yet (due to FUDCON and a bug in
mash which has just been solved). Initially only two mingw32 packages
should have got -debuginfo support (just enough to perform tests), but
due to a small mis-communication several other packages also got
updated.
I think it's best to continue this discussion on the fedora-mingw
mailing list instead of fedora-devel. There indeed are some issues
remaining which need to be solved.
Regards,
Erik van Pienbroek