Hi, Due to f20 mass rebuild[1], I've found that this macro is not presented in armv7 arch. When will this macro be available?

On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:56:06 +0800 Christopher Meng <cickumqt(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > Due to f20 mass rebuild[1], I've found that this macro is not > presented in armv7 arch. > > When will this macro be available? This macro is defined in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.systemd which is provided by the 'systemd' package. You seem to be missing a BuildRequires: systemd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd#Filesystem_locations I have no idea why it would have worked before without that. kevin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlH/M4wACgkQkSxm47BaWfdJ8QCfXQpeiN+RTqRA1vFUXXHlE+ZG 7UAAnjKVNMJIoCowteYQ4sSmtIujXLsO =7NcZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > This is not an arm specific issue. in the past systemd was pulled into > the minimal buildroot via deps. That has changed and its no longer > pulled in. on x86 as well as arm. Several of my packages now fail to build, because more docs are build, e.g. PDF versions appeared. Did someone compile a list of packages that were added/removed to the buildroot? > The packages that are explicitly pulled in are: > bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release findutils > gawk gcc gcc-c++ grep gzip info make patch redhat-rpm-config > rpm-build sed shadow-utils tar unzip util-linux which xz > > There is no need to BuildRequire any of them, what they pull in is > subject to change and should be added as a BuildRequires Actually the guidelines say otherwise: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 | There is no need to include the following packages or their ^^^^^^^^ | dependencies as BuildRequires because they would occur too often. ^^^^^^^^^^^^

And it also does not help when packages FTBS because of new packages added to the build root trough dependencies.

Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> This is not an arm specific issue. in the past systemd was pulled into >> the minimal buildroot via deps. That has changed and its no longer >> pulled in. on x86 as well as arm. > > Several of my packages now fail to build, because more docs are build, > e.g. PDF versions appeared. Did someone compile a list of packages that > were added/removed to the buildroot? > >> The packages that are explicitly pulled in are: >> bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release findutils >> gawk gcc gcc-c++ grep gzip info make patch redhat-rpm-config >> rpm-build sed shadow-utils tar unzip util-linux which xz >> >> There is no need to BuildRequire any of them, what they pull in is >> subject to change and should be added as a BuildRequires > > Actually the guidelines say otherwise: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > | There is no need to include the following packages or their > ^^^^^^^^ > | dependencies as BuildRequires because they would occur too often. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Turns out the "or their dependencies" part changed in this case, nothing particularly wrong about that. The idea is to avoid silly stuff like: BuildRequires: glibc BuildRequires: filesystem