On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 12:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Vladimir Kosovac wrote:
> Greetings, Motley Crew!
>
> I have couple of sandboxed pages ready for your review/input at:
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/wiki/VladimirKosovac/StylingPage/WorkPage
>
> As Karsten suggested, probably easier to review smaller chunks - thus
> this call. Of course, all suggestions are welcome and appreciated.
I would like to see how this section fits into the bigger guide. So
using the drafts space seems to be better. Do we follow the style of
exposing path and binary names anywhere as compared to highlighting the
menu entries in the desktop? This section would be good as a reference.
However a guide should cover tools from the administrative view point
and not just lump all the system-config* tools in a single page.
For example, if I am doing web services administration, I would expect
to learn about system-config-httpd in that section along with the Apache
configuration details.
That's an excellent point Rahul makes -- that our documentation should
be largely task-based. Relevant material should be lumped together
where possible and logical.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Project Board:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
Fedora Docs Project:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject