On 09/04/2018 04:30 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
project. "Non-technical" doesn't sound great, either... how about
"Technical" and "General"? "General" itself isn't very
descriptive
either, but I think it becomes clearer when the two terms are displayed
next to each other.
I would divide it into "General field" and "Technology field"
subprojects. As Matt said and I agree that renaming Mindshare is uncool.
Similar to as suggested on the issue
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/docs-fp-o/issue/88
but instead have:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/general/
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/general/mindshare
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/general/commops
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/general/advocate
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/general/docs
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/general/some-other-subproject ...
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/tech/
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/tech/fesco
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/tech/infra
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/tech/sigs
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/tech/some-other-subproject ...
This way nothing feels more important than the other and is easy to see via breadcrumb
(navigation).
One could have small partial introductions to each subproject that leads to its main
page.
Also just now found that this link was broken after being redirected (
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/fedora-project/council/fpgm.html ) visited from
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/commops/
Can we get some auto link checker that follows redirects? I will submit an issue about it.