-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 29 July 2005 16:23, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Isn't the color system and/or browser *dependent*? In other words, the
links are colored exactly the way any generic link is colored for the
end user, meaning they don't see anything they don't recognize.
However, I'm not against changing them, as long as we (a) agree on what
sticks out without sticking out TOO much, and (b) it is nicely
Fedora-like.
Oops...you are right. ;) The "generic" link is inherently capable of being
different on every node. Which brings to light the issue of fedora-like
representation to the end-user.
I like what yourself and Karsten have done with the new scheme. I personally
would think that some colors that promote a fedora-like visual appearance
would be great. The accepted standard of blue/purple are a safe bet. But then
again another selection from you/Karsten may provide more cohesion with the
new scheme.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC6gzJoR5cE1e/kEIRArbXAJ9dny/ScL+ixm9fAWB4UDRVzvdBIACgyxKl
HyG3k6usCG2Jq9NhXneaO/4=
=3VRY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----