On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:02:40AM -0500, Eric Christensen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 09:11 -0500, Matthew Daniels wrote:
> About two weeks ago, I had mentioned trying to finally finish the F9
> UG but that there were some chapters that I wasn't in the position to
> fact check. I think Karsten's suggestion that we publish a guide
> without these chapters (those chapters being on KDE and Xfce) actually
> had some merit (1), so that's the plan I'm going with right now.
You know, I had some of the same problems with some items in the
Security Guide. I went over to #fedora-kde and found a couple of guys
that proofed what I had written and validated it for me. I wonder if we
couldn't get some of the KDE people to come over to the Docs side and
help us out.
They have been very helpful in this regard in the past. A ton of KDE
content has been written initially by iirc Kevin Kofler.
We could also stagger; release without KDE and push KDE in as an
update. Early, often, etc. :)
- Karsten
--
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41