On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 13:12 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 17:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> There isnt any content relevant enough to do a errata. Let's move on and
> work on the FC6 test1 and above release notes.
I also don't think there is a need to completely stop updating the Wiki
for FC5, just make that the only place that is updated.
How about this:
1. Move content from Docs/Beats/.* to Docs/Beats/FC5/.* (or similar
namespace)
2. Continue work on D/B/FC5, as needed.
3. Link to D/B/FC5 from Web-only release notes as an absolute latest
place you can still get new content from.
4. Begin work on FC6t1 notes in D/B.
For example, Rahul posted a quick update about something today. I think
beat writers _should_ continue to do that. Eventually, this gives
Legacy a more living document to inherit.
- Karsten
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
Well for this to happen and not be an overwhelming pain in the rear
there needs to be a few things.
1. Updates and at this point there have not been any so why keep the
FC5 stuff around?
2. Automation of most of the processes.
<Warning Opinion Follows>
The release has now come and gone. We are holding on to the past. We can
and should move on, the added work for the minimal benefit to the
end-users in this case does not balance in my book.
--
Robert 'Bob' Jensen
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BobJensen
Fedora Documentation Projects
Release Notes Editor-in-Chief