On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 13:00 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 12:49 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:56 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:10 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > Here are the facts of licensing pertaining to xmlformat:
> > >
> > > (A) The original portions of xmlformat by Paul DuBois, paul at kitebird
> > > com, are licensed under a BSD-style license.[4] The BSD-style license
> > > is an open source license. The only portion of xmlformat not covered by
> > > this license is the implementation of the REX shallow parser.
> > >
> > > (B) The REX shallow parser, which is copyrighted by Robert D. Cameron,
> > > cameron at sfu ca, is licensed under terms shown below in their
> > > entirety:
> >
> > BSD and MIT are both FOSS licenses.
>
> If only the REX author had used one of those! :-)
How many clauses did you omit in your original description of the REX
license?
None. The licensing text is reproduced *in its entirety*, as I stated
in my message. The license is attached to the implementations of REX
written by the author of the paper from which they are drawn.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/