On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:41:32PM -0700, Clint Savage wrote:
They are not required, but are a really good idea. It provides
logical separation when thinking about what a particular application
(in this case CMS) does. If we keep the same subdomain for all the
structures, we'd logically separate on uri's. Seems more logical to
me to have it be domains/subdomains as the logical divide.
The key for me is consistency. Fedora Infrastructure and Websites
teams decided on a sub-domain model some time ago. I think the real
confusion is when it's a mix of sub-domain and nested folder
structures.
For this reason perhaps we should look at propagating
wiki.fedoraproject.org instead -- as part of rebirthing it as a
destination for contributors and other participants to be putting
Fedora content.
FWIW, the unique domain names are the ones that get me the most. I am
always trying to ssh in to
fedoraproject.org instead of
fedorapeople.org, and recently I got crossed by separate mailman
instances (is this true?) for
lists.fedorahosted.org and
lists.fedoraproject.org.
- Karsten
--
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41