> I'm also not clear if there is an intersect between the two
content
> types. Is there ever going to be a reason to have content migrate
> from magazine.fp.o to docs.fp.o? Are we going to share processes and
> workflows?
I can see that processes and workflows might be similar, but as for
sharing content the most I think will ever happen is magazine.fp.o
highlighting some docs content... maybe we'll run a how to feature and
republish some of the material or something like that.
We could categorise and have a URL structure, however if you're publishing
almost entirely unrelated stuff then a separate instance is probably simpler
(certainly on the access control side). The main overhead to this approach
comes at upgrade/patch time, but providing our number of instances doesn't
get out of control we'll be ok.