On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:51:40PM +1000, Christopher Curran wrote:
Christopher Curran wrote:
> Karsten Wade wrote:
>> * ACTION: quaid to work on the Fedora v. RHEL packaging
>> standards question -- are they equivalent or approximate.
>>
>>
>>
> Standards? Really? What about phpPgAdmin? or python-sexy? or
> perl-Net-LibIDN? or PyKDE4?
>
> Do they all follow the 'standards' too? Can I have a link to where the
> fedora standard is documented with rules prohibiting anything other
> than characters which don't work?
>
FYI: I am a fedora package maintainer, I'm interested to see where the
rules differ. I would like that link for further reference.
I'm confused as to your actual question above. But in any case, the
package review guidelines start here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug