Re: {RFC] XSLT for draft watermarking?

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 11:41 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote: All sounds great to me! As someone using the fedora/docs-common toolchain for internal process documentation, I would very much like the ability to overload with a custom *production* css. As you suggest, I think it makes sense to not have that information live in the document. I like the XSLHTML and XSLHTMLNOCHUNK environment variable approach because it allows us to keep in sync with fdp docs-common and use our own xsl tweaks when it comes to *production*. I made a few Makefile.common changes that allow for passing in a CSS env var that points to a css file. That file is then copied over as fedora.css. I would have liked to use ${DOCBASE}.css but I can't figure out how to use variables in the html-common.xsl. I have attached those changes just to show where I was headed. Thoughts/concerns? Thanks, James Laska -- ========================================== James Laska -- jlaska(a)redhat.com Quality Engineering -- Red Hat, Inc. ==========================================