i18n-bugs January 2009

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
205 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] New: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '09

05 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 Summary: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font Product: Fedora Localization Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Telugu [te] AssignedTo: kkrothap(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: arjunaraoc(a)googlemail.com QAContact: kkrothap(a)redhat.com CC: aalam(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Consonant+Virama+[Consonant+Virama]+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font. With Pothana2000 font, the rendering is correct. More details at this bug report. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] New: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Mar '09

02 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778 Summary: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: anthy AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: masaki.chikama(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The scim-bridge gets segv when conveting kanji from いちおく to 一億. >scim-bridge[2242]: segfault at 31 ip 001a7656 sp bf9644a0 error 4 in libanthydic.so.0.1.0[1a1000+3f000] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): scim-bridge-0.4.15-8.fc9.i386 anthy-9100e-3.fc9.i386 How reproducible: anlways Steps to Reproduce: 1. Turn on IME 2. input いちおく 3. hit space (convert to kanji) Actual results: scim-bridege died Expected results: get 一億 Additional info: The same problem reported on Debigan. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505776 There is some analysis about the problem by maintainer(?). (in Japanese) http://www.daionet.gr.jp/~knok/diary/?11161129 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] New: description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 Summary: description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: man-pages-ja AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: In : bash-3.2-29.fc10.i386 bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11.i386 LANG=C man bash says: ----------------------------------------- source: ...... When bash is not in posix mode, the current directory is searched if no file is found in PATH. ----------------------------------------- However with man-pages-ja-20081015-1.fc10, man bash says (in ja_JP): ----------------------------------------- source: ...... bash が posix モードで動作していれば、PATH 中でファイルを見つけられなかった場合には、カレントディレクトリが検索されます。 ----------------------------------------- This is quite opposite. Actually with bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11: ----------------------------------------- $ rpm -q bash bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11.i386 $ ls -al eval.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 323 2009-01-27 21:59 eval.sh $ sh -c ". eval.sh" sh: line 0: .: eval.sh: file not found ----------------------------------------- i.e. in posix mode source in sh does not search for the current directory any more -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] New: port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 Summary: port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kevin(a)tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora The upcoming Xfce 4.6 version will be dropping the old mcs config setup in favor of a new xfconf framework. I am intending to import 4.6b2 into rawhide soon. It would be great if you could port the imsettings-xfce plugin to the new settings model. Some useful links: http://svn.xfce.org/index.cgi/xfce/xfconf/trunk/ http://mocha.xfce.org/~kelnos/xfconf/docs-current/ Happy to try and get more info or help from upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482789] New: ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+<key>
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '09

18 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+<key> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482789 Summary: ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+<key> Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-m17n AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Ibus dose not allow to type key input with combination of Control+Alt keys. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-4.fc11.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. copy attached hi-test.mim file to /usr/share/m17n 2. start ibus 3. select hi-test.mim and try to use combination written in keymap file. Actual results: key combination C-A-<key> is not working Expected results: key combination C-A-<key> should not working Additional info: Attached sample hi-test.mim file to work on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '09

18 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466200] New: empty language list leads to backtrace
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: empty language list leads to backtrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466200 Summary: empty language list leads to backtrace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com, dcantrell(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Anaconda is backtraces with an empty language list. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.4.1.44-1 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. boot boot.iso 2. get to GUI Actual results: Language list is empty and then anaconda backtraces. Expected results: Full lang list as usual -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462295] New: not displaying Korean glyphs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: not displaying Korean glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462295 Summary: not displaying Korean glyphs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: We changed the default font for Korean in F10 from baekmuk-ttf-fonts to un-core-fonts-dotum. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.4.1.34-1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. do a Korean install of rawhide Actual results: unicode boxes appear in place of Hangul glyphs. Expected results: Korean to display normally -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 19

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Feb '09

15 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
21
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs January 2009