i18n-bugs April 2009

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
216 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478503] New: Translated to Brazilian Portuguese
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Sep '09

21 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Translated to Brazilian Portuguese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478503 Summary: Translated to Brazilian Portuguese Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: taylonsilva(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Translated to Brazilian Portuguese. The .po file is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Sep '09

15 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: culmus-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 490373] New: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Sep '09

14 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373 Summary: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora We advocate building fonts from sources but do not do it for lohit which is a Red Hat/Fedora font project. Please make the lohit package generate fonts from sfds (as the dejavu people showed, regular building from sources helps improve both fonts and font tools) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 494487] New: [sd_IN@devanagari] Please add Sindhi (devanagari) language to language selection menu in anaconda
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Sep '09

07 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [sd_IN@devanagari] Please add Sindhi (devanagari) language to language selection menu in anaconda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494487 Summary: [sd_IN@devanagari] Please add Sindhi (devanagari) language to language selection menu in anaconda Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pjones(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com, kanarip(a)kanarip.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, rmaximo(a)cfl.rr.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Sindhi (devanagari) language is not available in the anaconda menu at install time. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.5.0.40-1.i586 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start Fedora installation 2. Proceed to the step that asks you to choose the language to use in the install process Actual results: Sindhi (devanagari) languages are not in the list Expected results: Sindhi (devanagari) languages should be in the list Additional info: I see translations are not available there. So I am not sure how anaconda maintainers like to handle this bug. But I thought as we have got locale available and font is available now and inscript keymap for this language is also available, I see its good to have this listed in anaconda. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 494486] New: [ks_IN@devanagari] Please add Kashmiri (devanagari) language to language selection menu in anaconda
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Sep '09

07 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ks_IN@devanagari] Please add Kashmiri (devanagari) language to language selection menu in anaconda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494486 Summary: [ks_IN@devanagari] Please add Kashmiri (devanagari) language to language selection menu in anaconda Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pjones(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, anaconda-maint-list(a)redhat.com, kanarip(a)kanarip.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, rmaximo(a)cfl.rr.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Kashmiri (devanagari) language is not available in the anaconda menu at install time. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-11.5.0.40-1.i586 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start Fedora installation 2. Proceed to the step that asks you to choose the language to use in the install process Actual results: Kashmiri (devanagari) languages are not in the list Expected results: Kashmiri (devanagari) languages should be in the list Additional info: I see translations are not available there. So I am not sure how anaconda maintainers like to handle this bug. But I thought as we have got locale available and font is available now and there is work going on to add inscript keymap for this language, I see its good to have this listed in anaconda. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 489523] New: ibus oddities with F11 alpha
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Sep '09

06 Sep '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus oddities with F11 alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489523 Summary: ibus oddities with F11 alpha Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jason(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When I logged on to the F11 alpha live CD, there was a floating tab on my desktop which seemed to be for selecting the iBus engine. yum update ibus made it go away, but I got an error "GLib version too old (micro mismatch)"; apparently 2.19.5 isn't enough for ibus-gtk. Updating glib2 to 2.19.10 seemed to fix that issue. But now the input method chooser seems to be confused; enabling the input method feature with Preferences/Personal/Input Method doesn't stick, if I open the dialog again the checkbox is still off. Updating im-chooser didn't affect this issue; the applet in the notification error pops up an error about "mismatch the version of im-settings-daemon, no detailed information" I haven't updated the whole system, as I don't think I have enough room on the USB stick and yum is failing to update glibc at the moment. And I don't really care about iBus, just wanted that floater to go away. Feel free to close this bug if it doesn't have any useful information for you. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '09

31 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, smallvil(a)get9.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483391] New: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #202400 +++ Description of problem: following glyphs are not present in Lohit Telugu U+0C3D ఽ TELUGU SIGN AVAGRAHA U+0C58 ౘ TELUGU LETTER TSA U+0C59 ౙ TELUGU LETTER DZA U+0C62 ౢ TELUGU VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC L U+0C63 ౣ TELUGU VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC LL U+0C78 ౸ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ZERO FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C79 ౹ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7A ౺ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7B ౻ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7C ౼ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7D ౽ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7E ౾ TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7F ౿ TELUGU SIGN TUUMU Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-fonts-2.3.1-1.fc10 Additional info: 1) http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-5.1/U51-0C00.pdf (chart showing new characters) 2) http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3116.pdf (proposal for adding these characters among others, that details the use of these characters) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 493858] New: S-c-tools cleanup: bad spacings, alignment, layout
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: bad spacings, alignment, layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493858 Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: bad spacings, alignment, layout Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rrakus(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem A clean, logical dialog layout helps the user to quickly understand what information is required from them. It's very important to have proper spacing between window borders, controls and separators (if used), controls alignment etc. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce 1. invoke any dialog Actual results Incorrect controls spacing and alignment. Expected results Correct window/dialog layout. Additional info Look at GNOME Human Interface Guidelines 2.2 [1] [2] [3] [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/design-window.html.en [2] http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/windows-dialog.html.en [3] http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/windows-alert.html.en#alert-… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 493888] New: S-c-tools cleanup: make OK button insensitive when no action has been taken.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: make OK button insensitive when no action has been taken. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493888 Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: make OK button insensitive when no action has been taken. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rrakus(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: "OK" button is sensitive even no changes were done but it should be insensitive when "Cancel" button available. How reproducible: /*places*/ Steps to Reproduce: 1. invoke some dialog 2. check if "OK" button is sensitive Actual results: "OK" button is sensitive. Expected results: "OK" should not be sensitive. Additional info: This bug report is part of "System Configuration Tools Cleanup Project". Don't hesitate to ask project maintainers for any kind of help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs April 2009