i18n-bugs April 2009

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
216 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 496886] New: libchewing-debuginfo does not contain sources
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '09

10 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libchewing-debuginfo does not contain sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496886 Summary: libchewing-debuginfo does not contain sources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009 -April/msg00509.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: high Component: libchewing AssignedTo: dchen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: debarshi.ray(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The debuginfo sub-package is supposed to contain the source files, which is not the case for libchewing. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): All versions currently available for Rawhide, Fedora 11, Fedora 10 and Fedora 9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 39

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 496795] New: UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '09

10 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496795 Summary: UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil(a)get9.net ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, smallvil(a)get9.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Just realized that gucharmap displays glyphs at CJK Unified Ideographs with UnDotum for Sans even if I run it on ja locale, because of the fontconfig config. Please use the locale-specific overrides rule instead of the simple priority lists rule. that breaks other locale-specific overrides rule. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.install un-core-fonts-dotum and vlgothic-fonts 2.run gucharmap with LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 3.set Sans as a font and right-click on any glyphs at CJK Unified Ideographs Actual results: rendered with UnDotum Expected results: rendered with VL Gothic Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 495020] New: [mr_IN] translations are broken for Marathi language ISO-639 language names
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Aug '09

04 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mr_IN] translations are broken for Marathi language ISO-639 language names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495020 Summary: [mr_IN] translations are broken for Marathi language ISO-639 language names Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iso-codes AssignedTo: caillon(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, caillon(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, sshedmak(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=338861) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=338861) broken translations for Marathi language Description of problem: Marathi translations need to be corrected as most of strings are appearing broken with non-existence unicode character U0974 and U0956 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): iso-codes-3.7-1.fc11 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. boot desktop in Marathi and see gdm language list broken OR 2. use ibus-setup command in Marathi locale and check language names appearing broken. Actual results: Marathi translations are incorrect. Expected results: Marathi translations should be correct. Additional info: Borken po file in source located as iso_639/mr.po -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477419] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: lklug-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476511] New: scim bad file descriptor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '09

21 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim bad file descriptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476511 Summary: scim bad file descriptor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: scim-bridge AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: chanueting(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: "scim-bridge: An exception occurred at selecting the sockets: Bad file descriptor" is shown in the log. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): scim-1.4.7-35.fc10 (i386) scim-bridge-gtk-0.4.15-8.fc10 How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot up a machine with scim installed. 2. 3. Actual results: I can see this message in message log: localhost scim-bridge: An exception occurred at selecting the sockets: Bad file descriptor At the same time, there are increasing number of scim-bridge process those obtain many memory. Expected results: There should not be increasing of memory usage. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465214] New: emacs should disable XIM by default
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '09

21 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: emacs should disable XIM by default https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465214 Summary: emacs should disable XIM by default Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: emacs AssignedTo: coldwell(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: coldwell(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 438944 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: XIM (X Input Method protocol) is pretty intrusive for Emacs users specially for SCIM which defaults to using C-Space as its hotkey, and anyway Emacs provides its own superior builtin input methods designed for native input. I propose that we turn off XIM by default Emacs for fedora. It can still be enabled by users using the X resource useXIM. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run Emacs with SCIM enabled. 2. Press C-Space Actual results: 2. SCIM is enabled Expected results: 2. mark to be set Additional info: Emacs is capable of input most major Asian languages adequately by itself and also can support has package that support anthy, scim-bridge and uim via elisp, therefore is no need to have XIM enabled by default any longer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 496902] New: inttypes_h.m4 and signed.m4 (probably)from /usr/share/gettext/archive.tar.gz dont compile with -Wall -Werror
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '09

19 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: inttypes_h.m4 and signed.m4 (probably)from /usr/share/gettext/archive.tar.gz dont compile with -Wall -Werror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496902 Summary: inttypes_h.m4 and signed.m4 (probably)from /usr/share/gettext/archive.tar.gz dont compile with -Wall -Werror Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: gettext AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pal(a)interexc.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: inttypes_h.m4 and signed.m4 (probably)from /usr/share/gettext/archive.tar.gz dont compile with -Wall -Werror conftest.cpp:38: error: unused variable 'i' conftest.cpp:32: error: unused variable 'x' fixes: --- inttypes_h.m4~ 2009-04-21 18:21:28.000000000 +0300 +++ inttypes_h.m4 2009-04-21 17:56:39.000000000 +0300 @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ [AC_TRY_COMPILE( [#include <sys/types.h> #include <inttypes.h>], - [uintmax_t i = (uintmax_t) -1;], + [uintmax_t i = (uintmax_t) -1;i=i], gl_cv_header_inttypes_h=yes, gl_cv_header_inttypes_h=no)]) if test $gl_cv_header_inttypes_h = yes; then --- signed.m4~ 2009-04-21 18:21:39.000000000 +0300 +++ signed.m4 2009-04-21 17:57:11.000000000 +0300 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([bh_C_SIGNED], [ AC_CACHE_CHECK([for signed], bh_cv_c_signed, - [AC_TRY_COMPILE(, [signed char x;], bh_cv_c_signed=yes, bh_cv_c_signed=no)]) + [AC_TRY_COMPILE(, [signed char x=' ';x=x;], bh_cv_c_signed=yes, bh_cv_c_signed=no)]) if test $bh_cv_c_signed = no; then AC_DEFINE(signed, , [Define to empty if the C compiler doesn't support this keyword.]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477421] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: madan-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 493824] New: S-c-tools cleanup: dialogs centered on screen/main application window
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: dialogs centered on screen/main application window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493824 Summary: S-c-tools cleanup: dialogs centered on screen/main application window Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rrakus(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Child dialogs should be centered on parent window, not on screen/main application window. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. invoke some dialog (for example About dialog) 2. check dialog centering Actual results: Dialogs centered on screen/main application window. Expected results: Dialogs centered on parent window. Additional info: This bug report is part of "System Configuration Tools Cleanup Project". Don't hesitate to ask project maintainers for any kind of help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477405] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: kacst-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs April 2009