i18n-bugs March 2015

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
253 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 156477] RFE: option to reduce disk usage of /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive by only installing required language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=156477 --- Comment #42 from Edgar Hoch <edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de> --- (In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #41) > Maintaining the minimum set of installed locales requires modifying > /usr/lib/rpm/macros `%_install_langs`. > > Reinstalling the missing locales you want requires reinstalling glibc-common > with an updated value for `%_install_langs`. Wouldn't it be better to put a file in /etc/rpm/ which sets (overwrites) the value of `%_install_langs` instead of modifying the global config file /usr/lib/rpm/macros, _and_ requiring reinstalling glibc-common? I think that files in /usr/ should never contain a host-specific configuration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Bp6pJrCpni&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 156477] RFE: option to reduce disk usage of /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive by only installing required language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=156477 Carlos O'Donell <codonell(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed|2005-05-03 11:28:14 |2015-03-05 16:12:01 --- Comment #41 from Carlos O'Donell <codonell(a)redhat.com> --- Committed! I just finished testing on Rawhide with a /usr/lib/rpm/macros that defines `%_install_langs en` and a full upgrade works as expected and reduces the set of installed languages to en_* and only a ~3.5MB /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive. This enhancement means that with an edited /usr/lib/rpm/macros, or an installer setting %_install_langs you'll have a minimized set of installed locales. Maintaining the minimum set of installed locales requires modifying /usr/lib/rpm/macros `%_install_langs`. Reinstalling the missing locales you want requires reinstalling glibc-common with an updated value for `%_install_langs`. The next step is going to be to split up the locales into sub-packages and deal with that part-by-part, but the immediate need for minimal cloud, server, or docker images is now met. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b2BLUL1kx3&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1190078] KeyError: 'sr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190078 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Package langtable-0.0.31-1.fc22: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing langtable-0.0.31-1.fc22' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3277/langtable-0.0.31-1… then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bh5ZOyTOKj&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1190078] KeyError: 'sr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190078 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- langtable-0.0.31-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/langtable-0.0.31-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Cd8phcEdeu&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1190078] KeyError: 'sr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190078 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zAiAWUtV0C&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1190078] KeyError: 'sr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190078 David Shea <dshea(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org, mfabian(a)redhat.com Component|anaconda |langtable Assignee|dshea(a)redhat.com |mfabian(a)redhat.com --- Comment #14 from David Shea <dshea(a)redhat.com> --- Sent upstream pull request: https://github.com/mike-fabian/langtable/pull/3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=voUZKvs2iC&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1172524] New: ibus-table log could use xdg
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172524 Bug ID: 1172524 Summary: ibus-table log could use xdg Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ibus-table Assignee: mfabian(a)redhat.com Reporter: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kent.neo(a)gmail.com, me(a)kaio.net, mfabian(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ibus-table/engine/main.py uses ~/.ibus/tables/debug.log but I'd suggest to use XDG ~/.cache to reduce dot files under the home directory. http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/latest/ar01s03.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HsP3n2nr67&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1198246] Review Request: oflb-coval-fonts - Derivation of other free of charge fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198246 --- Comment #7 from Carlos (Morel-Riquelme) <iddnna(a)gmail.com> --- Thank Paulo, here are my answers 1) i use oflb prefix cuz the font is is published as "open font library" and parag recommend this. 2) the version of package is equal to the metadata in the font, in my first revision my version was 0.1 or 1 , but parag tell me that is god idea respect the metadata in the font. so i just run ttname -a coval.otf 3) parag recommend use 63, now i can't remember the wiki link with the info, sorry 4)thank for the suggestion 5) Now i nned lear about fedora review and how make a good reviews of other packages 6) Also run appstream-util over the font.xml, but i add to the buildrequire appdata-tools Thank Paulo :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=T5t7BE7dw5&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1198040] Review Request: gnome-characters - Character map application for GNOME
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198040 --- Comment #2 from Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> --- I've put updated spec and SRPM on the same location. It should fix the rpmlint errors previously reported, while it adds a new one: gnome-characters.src:24: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(gnulib) I guess it can be ignored. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GIvyV9elMx&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1198246] Review Request: oflb-coval-fonts - Derivation of other free of charge fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198246 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com> --- Hi Carlos. First I believe Parag instructions were all correct, and Parag already knows a lot about fonts, appdata, etc issues. Also, I was looking at previous reviews, and your reviews. I really would like some input from Parag on this, as I do not want to step over, as Parag was about to sponsor you. Carlos, you change your accounts too fast, it is hard to keep track of you :) Since you asked me in a private email, I will help you; and I understand you want to become a packager and contribute :) the fact that you can talk to me in spanish and understand me talking portuguese helps :) But I need you to comment on the below issues; some are actually to help me better help you :), as I maintain mostly scientific/math packages in Fedora. 1) The prefix "oflb" prefix/foundry, can you comment on it? Is it standard? Maybe it would be better named breton-Coval-fonts ? 2) I believe you should use 0 as version, in case upstream switches to a properly versioned release. That is, instead of "Version: 1.00" have "Version: 0", and for release can keep the same format, so that when rebuilding, bump the leading "1". 3) Please give an explanation about the values, and why choosing 63-oflb-coval.conf for fontconfig, I mean the reason of choosing 63. 4) I do not like the idea of using fold to reformat the license file. Please use only sed. 5) Your reviews were mostly asking for spelling corrections due to rpmlint warnings. Unless it is really really wrong, please ignore those warnings. You started using fedora-review and setting mock options, etc, so, could trigger by yourself a lot of different kinds of errors, that is good :) 6) I suggest adding "BuildRequires: appdata-tools" to the spec, and in %install, run "appstream-util validate coval.metainfo.xml" or "validate-relax", that will cause it to pass. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uc3r4fGkEP&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs March 2015