Hello,
From version 1.1.5 , ghc-hslogger will be under BSD license. Earlier it was
under LGPLv2 license. Is this change acceptable for Fedora?
lakshminaras2002@gmail.com wrote, at 08/27/2011 04:09 PM +9:00:
Hello, From version 1.1.5 , ghc-hslogger will be under BSD license. Earlier it was under LGPLv2 license. Is this change acceptable for Fedora?
-- Regards Lakshmi Narasimhan T V
Acceptable. Just announce it on devel list.
Regards, Mamoru
On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 18:26 +0900, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
lakshminaras2002@gmail.com wrote, at 08/27/2011 04:09 PM +9:00:
From version 1.1.5 , ghc-hslogger will be under BSD license. Earlier it was under LGPLv2 license. Is this change acceptable for Fedora?
Acceptable. Just announce it on devel list.
Since BSD allows a superset of what LGPLv2 allows, an announcement is probably not necessary for compliance (though I would not contradict official advice). It would still serve to let people who cannot use LGPLv2 content know that they can now use ghc-hslogger.
-
Lakshmi Narasimhan T V -
Mamoru TASAKA -
Matt McCutchen